Show simple item record

AuthorAlNouss A.
AuthorMcKay G.
AuthorAl-Ansari T.
Available date2020-04-23T14:21:31Z
Publication Date2019
Publication NameEnergy Conversion and Management
ResourceScopus
ISSN1968904
URIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.06.019
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/14319
AbstractThe production of renewable chemicals and fuels is driving modern society towards a type of sustainable development which involves a decreasing dependency on fossil fuels and the minimisation of waste. Biomass, a waste by-product from the urban environment, is a carbon dioxide neutral organic fuel that can potentially serve as a feedstock for the production of sustainable power and heat. Gasification is preferred over the other thermal conversion options for biomass processing whereby the product synthesis gas can be utilised to power generators/turbines and generate clean energy, ammonia and methanol. Incidentally, efficient and economically sound biomass driven supply chains can be integrated into an existing petrochemical infrastructure. Moreover, the potential production volumes of fuels and green chemicals can also be increased by the addition of multiple biomass sources, thereby creating potential positive scale effects. This study proposes a new poly-generation process that utilises multiple sources of biomass feedstock to produce high quality urea, methanol, Fisher-Tropsch liquids and power. Four flowsheet configurations are simulated using Aspen Plus software and the built-in capabilities of the activated analysis using Aspen Process Economic Analyzer and Aspen Energy Analyzer to perform the economic, energy and environmental impact calculations. The results demonstrate that the methanol production technique is the most economic process pathway with a net profit of approximately $0.035 per kg of biomass input, whilst the urea process pathway presents the lowest environmental impact solution with approximately 0.71 kg of CO2-e per kg of biomass input. These results are relative and can be analysed from different perspectives based on the market demand of the products and their applications and local need. For instance, considering at the economic and environmental indicators relative to the production capacity, production of liquid fuels achieve net profits of approximately $0.27 per kg of product, whilst urea production demonstrates the lowest environmental emissions of approximately 3.93 kg of CO2-e per kg of product. - 2019 Elsevier Ltd
SponsorThe authors acknowledge the support of Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) (a member of Qatar Foundation , Qatar) by GSRA grant No GSRA4-1-0518-17082 . The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.
Languageen
PublisherElsevier Ltd
SubjectBiomass Gasification
Enviro-Economic
Pareto Analysis
Poly-generation
Value-added products
TitleA techno-economic-environmental study evaluating the potential of oxygen-steam biomass gasification for the generation of value-added products
TypeArticle
Pagination664-676
Volume Number196


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record