Show simple item record

AuthorZarafshan, Pejman
AuthorEtezadi, Hamed
AuthorJavadi, Saman
AuthorRoozbahani, Abbas
AuthorHashemy, S. Mehdi
AuthorZarafshan, Payam
Available date2023-07-31T06:38:35Z
Publication Date2023-08-01
Publication NameActa Geophysica
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00948-8
CitationZarafshan, P., Etezadi, H., Javadi, S., Roozbahani, A., Hashemy, S. M., & Zarafshan, P. (2022). Comparison of machine learning models for predicting groundwater level, case study: Najafabad region. Acta Geophysica, 1-14.‏
ISSN18956572
URIhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85142188228&origin=inward
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/46418
AbstractWater resources, consisting of surface water and groundwater, are considered to be among the crucial natural resources in most arid and semiarid regions. Groundwater resources as the sustainable yields can be predicted, whereas this is one of the important stages in water resource management. To this end, several models such as mathematical, statistical, empirical, and conceptual can be employed. In this paper, machine learning and deep learning methods as conceptual ones are applied for the simulations. The selected models are support vector regression (SVR), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). Next, these models are optimized with the adaptive moment estimation (ADAM) optimization algorithm which results in hybrid models. The hyper-parameters of the stated models are optimized with the ADAM method. The root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and coefficient of determination (R2) are used to evaluate the accuracy of the simulated groundwater level. To this end, the aquifer hydrograph is used to compare the results with observations data. So, the RMSE and R2 show that the accuracy of the machine learning and deep learning models is better than the numerical model for the given data. Moreover, the MSE is approximately the same in all three cases (ranging from 0.7113 to 0.6504). Also, the total value of R2 and RMSE for the best hybrid model is 0.9617 and 0.7313, respectively, which are obtained from the model output. The results show that all three techniques are useful tools for modeling hydrological processes in agriculture and their computational capabilities and memory are similar.
Languageen
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
SubjectADAM
ANFIS
Groundwater
MLP
SVR
TitleComparison of machine learning models for predicting groundwater level, case study: Najafabad region
TypeArticle
Pagination1-14
Issue Number4
Volume Number71


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record