Show simple item record

AuthorTran, Michelle
AuthorPesah, Ella
AuthorTurk-Adawi, Karam
AuthorSupervia, Marta
AuthorLopez Jimenez, Francisco
AuthorOh, Paul
AuthorBaer, Carolyn
AuthorGrace, Sherry L
Available date2018-10-14T08:46:25Z
Publication Date2018-10-01
Publication NameCanadian Journal of Cardiology
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.413
CitationTran, M., Pesah, E., Turk-Adawi, K., Supervia, M., Jimenez, F. L., Oh, P., ... & Grace, S. L. (2018). Cardiac Rehabilitation Availability and Delivery in Canada: How does it Compare to other High-Income Countries?. Canadian Journal of Cardiology.
ISSN0828-282X
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/11136
AbstractCanada has insufficient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) capacity, yet unmet need is unknown. Moreover, Canada has CR guidelines, but whether delivery conforms has not been characterized by province/territory. This study aimed to establish (1) CR volumes, capacity, and density, as well as (2) the nature of programs, and (3) compare these (a) by province/territory and (b) with other high-income countries (HICs). In this cross-sectional study, an online survey was administered to CR programs globally. National cardiac associations were engaged to facilitate program identification where available, or local champions. Density was computed using Canada's Chronic Disease Surveillance System ischemic heart disease incidence estimates. Twenty-eight HICs with CR were selected for comparison (N = 619 programs), and multilevel analyses performed. CR was available in 10 of 13 (76.9%) provinces (no programs in Canada's North), with 74 of 182 programs initiating a survey (40.7% response). Program volumes (median = 250) were greatest in Ontario, but ultimately there was only 1 CR spot per 4.55 patients with ischemic heart disease nationally (similar in other HICs), and 186,187 more spots are needed annually. Most programs were funded by government/hospital sources (n = 48, 66.7%), but in 23 (31.5%), patients paid some or all of program costs out-of-pocket. Guideline-indicated conditions were accepted in more than 90% of programs. Programs had a multidisciplinary team of 6.2 ± 2.1 staff, offering 7.7 ± 1.5/10 core components (varied by province, P = 0.001; return-to-work offered less frequently than other HICs; P = 0.03), over 42.0 ± 26.0 hours (provincial and other HIC differences, P < 0.001). Canadian CR capacity must be augmented, but where available, services are consistent with other HICs.
Languageen
PublisherElsevier
SubjectCardiac rehabilitation
Canada
Health service
quality
TitleCardiac Rehabilitation Availability and Delivery in Canada: How Does It Compare With Other High-Income Countries?
TypeArticle
Pagination252-262
Issue Number10
Volume Number34
ESSN1916-7075
dc.accessType Abstract Only


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record