Show simple item record

AuthorDjaoui L.
AuthorHaddad M.
AuthorChamari K.
AuthorDellal A.
Available date2020-03-03T06:19:04Z
Publication Date2018
Publication NamePhysiology and Behavior
ResourceScopus
ISSN319384
URIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.041
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/13114
AbstractIn the introduction of the paper [1], it is stated that: “Subjective measures such as the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) [6], for which players are asked to grade their own perceived load, could be used to quantify fatigue and training load”. However, as wisely described by Micklewright et al. [2]: “… perceived exertion, or the subjective experience of how hard a physical task feels was felt, is quite different compared to perceived fatigue, which we argue is a feeling of diminishing capacity to cope with physical or mental stressors (either imagined or real). (…) while we acknowledge the excellent psychophysical properties of most perceived exertion scales, measurements of exertion should only be used for their intended purpose of quantifying how hard a task feels. This suggests that perceived exertion scales should not be used to measure fatigue or fatigability”. Therefore we would like to acknowledge that RPE could be used to quantify training load but it is not specifically targeting fatigue, as it has been stated in our and in other manuscripts.
Languageen
PublisherElsevier Inc.
SubjectMonitoring training
soccer players
TitleCorrigendum to Monitoring training load and fatigue in soccer players with physiological markers
TypeArticle
Volume Number194
dc.accessType Abstract Only


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record