Show simple item record

AuthorQin, Chenxi
AuthorGuo, Yu
AuthorPei, Pei
AuthorDu, Huaidong
AuthorYang, Ling
AuthorChen, Yiping
AuthorShen, Xi
AuthorShi, Zumin
AuthorQi, Lu
AuthorChen, Junshi
AuthorChen, Zhengming
AuthorYu, Canqing
AuthorLv, Jun
AuthorLi, Liming
Available date2022-03-27T05:25:34Z
Publication Date2022-02-01
Publication NameNutrients
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14040794
CitationQin, C.; Guo, Y.; Pei, P.; Du, H.; Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Shen, X.; Shi, Z.; Qi, L.; Chen, J.; Chen, Z.; Yu, C.; Lv, J.; Li, L. The Relative Validity and Reproducibility of Food Frequency Questionnaires in the China Kadoorie Biobank Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040794
URIhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85124403157&origin=inward
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/29018
AbstractBackground: Short versions of qualitative and quantitative food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) are widely used to assess usual food intake. However, fewer studies evaluated their relative validity and reproducibility in the Chinese population. Methods: This study compared 12-day 24-h dietary recalls with qualitative and quantitative FFQs designed by the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) study to assess the relative validity. Two FFQs were administered in the second and third seasons and compared to evaluate the reproducibility. Statistical tests included Spearman correlation coefficients, weighted kappa, and cross-classification. Results: A total of 432 participants were eligible after stratifying by age, sex, and four regions. In the validation of qualitative FFQ, adjusted Spearman coefficients were between 0.23 and 0.59, and weighted kappa coefficients ranged from 0.61 to 0.88, except for fresh vegetables. The percentage of correct classification was highest in fresh vegetables and lowest in fresh fruit, but the percentages of extreme classification were below 3.0%. Corresponding Spearman and kappa coefficients for the reproducibility were 0.17–0.56 and 0.62–0.90. Furthermore, the correct classification constituted between 35.6 and 93.3% of all participants. Regarding the relative validity of the quantitative FFQ, Spearman coefficients ranged from 0.14 to 0.69 in addition to dried vegetables and carbonated soft drinks. For items with more than two-thirds of total participants consumed, weighted kappa coefficients were from 0.57 to 0.79; correct classification percentages were between 34.6% and 67.5%. Spearman and kappa coefficients for the reproducibility of the quantitative FFQ were 0.15–0.71 and 0.60–0.86, respectively; correct classification percentages varied from 47.8% to 71.6%. Conclusion: Most food items from the qualitative FFQ showed acceptable or even good relative validity and reproducibility in the CKB study. Likewise, major food items in the quantitative FFQ were valid and reproducible, but poor performances of dried vegetables and carbonated soft drinks indicated the need for modification and validation in future research.
SponsorThis work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973125) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0900500, 2016YFC0900501, 2016YFC0900504). The CKB baseline survey and the first re-survey were supported by a grant from the Kadoorie Charitable Foundation in Hong Kong. The long-term follow-up is supported by grants National Natural Science Foundation of China (81390540, 81390541, 81390544), and Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (2011BAI09B01). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication.
Languageen
PublisherMDPI
SubjectFood frequency questionnaire
Reproducibility
Validity
TitleThe Relative Validity and Reproducibility of Food Frequency Questionnaires in the China Kadoorie Biobank Study
TypeArticle
Issue Number4
Volume Number14
ESSN2072-6643
dc.accessType Open Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record