Show simple item record

AuthorAlam, Mohammed Fasihul
AuthorLongo, Mirella
AuthorCohen, David
AuthorGroves, Sam
AuthorAlrubaiy, Laith
AuthorHutchings, Hayley A
AuthorWatkins, Alan
AuthorSebastain, Shaji
AuthorWilliams, John G
Available date2023-03-16T05:24:38Z
Publication Date2023-03-08
Publication NameBMC Health Services Research
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09233-w
CitationAlam, M.F., Longo, M., Cohen, D. et al. Infliximab versus ciclosporin in steroid resistant acute severe ulcerative colitis: a model-based cost-utility analysis of data from CONSTRUCT pragmatic trial. BMC Health Serv Res 23, 226 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09233-w
ISSN1472-6963
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/41164
AbstractThere is limited evidence in the literature on the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC). The study aimed to perform decision analytic model-based long-term cost-utility analysis (CUA) of infliximab versus ciclosporin for steroid-resistant ASUC investigated in CONSTRUCT pragmatic trial. A decision tree (DT) model was developed using two-year health effect, resource use and costs data from CONSTRUCT trial to estimate relative cost-effectiveness of two competing drugs from the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Services (NHS) perspective. Using short-term trial data, a Markov model (MM) was then developed and evaluated over further 18 years. Both DT and MM were combined to investigate cost-effectiveness of infliximab versus ciclosporin for ASUC patients over 20-year time horizon, with a rigorous multiple deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to address uncertainty in results. The decision tree mirrored trial-based results. Beyond 2-year trial follow-up, Markov model predicted a decrease in colectomy rate, but it remained slightly higher for ciclosporin. NHS costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) over base-case 20 year time horizon were £26,793 and 9.816 for ciclosporin and £34,185 and 9.106 for infliximab, suggesting ciclosporin dominates infliximab. Ciclosporin had 95% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold value up to £20,000. Using data from a pragmatic RCT, the cost-effectiveness models produced incremental net health benefit in favour of ciclosporin relative to infliximab. Results from long-term modelling indicated that ciclosporin remains dominant compared with infliximab for the treatment of NHS ASUC patients, however, these need to be interpreted cautiously. CONSTRUCT Trial registration number ISRCTN22663589; EudraCT number: 2008- 001968-36 (Date 27/08/2008).
SponsorOpen Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library. The CONSTRUCT trial was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme (project no. 06/78/03).
Languageen
PublisherBMC
SubjectCiclosporin
Cost-effectiveness
Decision tree
Infliximab
Markov model
Ulcerative colitis
TitleInfliximab versus ciclosporin in steroid resistant acute severe ulcerative colitis: a model-based cost-utility analysis of data from CONSTRUCT pragmatic trial.
TypeArticle
Issue Number1
Volume Number23
dc.accessType Open Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record