Comparison of intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen) to intravenously or intramuscularly administered non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or opioids for patients presenting with moderate to severe acute pain conditions to the ED: systematic review and meta-analysis.
المؤلف | Qureshi, Isma |
المؤلف | Abdulrashid, Khadiga |
المؤلف | Thomas, Stephen H |
المؤلف | Abdel-Rahman, Manar E |
المؤلف | Pathan, Sameer A |
المؤلف | Harris, Tim |
تاريخ الإتاحة | 2023-05-21T06:29:37Z |
تاريخ النشر | 2023-05-12 |
اسم المنشور | Emergency Medicine Journal |
المعرّف | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212869 |
الاقتباس | Qureshi I, Abdulrashid K, Thomas SH, et alComparison of intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen) to intravenously or intramuscularly administered non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or opioids for patients presenting with moderate to severe acute pain conditions to the ED: systematic review and meta-analysisEmergency Medicine Journal Published Online First: 12 May 2023. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212869 |
الرقم المعياري الدولي للكتاب | 1472-0205 |
الملخص | Paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opiates/opioids, administered parenterally via intravenous or intramuscular route, are widely used to provide analgesia for patients with moderate to severe pain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the level of analgesia provided by intravenous paracetamol (IVP) alone compared with NSAIDs (intravenous or intramuscular), or opioids (intravenous) alone in adults attending the ED with acute pain. Two authors independently searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Embase (OVID), Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and Google Scholar (3 March 2021-20 May 2022) for randomised trials without any language or date restriction. Clinical trials were evaluated using the Risk of Bias V.2 tool. The primary outcome was mean difference (MD) for pain reduction at 30 min (T30) post analgesia delivery. The secondary outcomes were MD in pain reduction at 60, 90 and 120 min; the need for rescue analgesia; and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Twenty-seven trials (5427 patients) were included in the systematic review and 25 trials (5006 patients) in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in pain reduction at T30 between the IVP group and opioids (MD -0.13, 95% CI -1.49 to 1.22) or IVP and NSAIDs (MD -0.27, 95% CI -1.0 to 1.54. There was also no difference at 60 min, IVP group versus opioid group (MD -0.09, 95% CI -2.69 to 2.52) or IVP versus NSAIDs (MD 0.51, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.91). The quality of the evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development and Evaluations methodology was low for MD in pain scores.The need for rescue analgesia at T30 was significantly higher in the IVP group compared with the NSAID group (risk ratio (RR): 1.50, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.83), with no difference found between the IVP group and the opioid group (RR: 1.07, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.70). AEs were 50% lower in the IVP group compared with the opioid group (RR: 0.50, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.62), whereas no difference was observed in the IVP group compared with the NSAID group (RR: 1.30, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.15). In patients presenting to the ED with a diverse range of pain conditions, IVP provides similar levels of pain relief compared with opiates/opioids or NSAIDs at T30 post administration. Patients treated with NSAIDs had lower risk of rescue analgesia, and opioids cause more AEs, suggesting NSAIDs as the first-choice analgesia and IVP as a suitable alternative. CRD42021240099. |
اللغة | en |
الناشر | BMJ Publishing Group |
الموضوع | analgesia effectiveness efficiency emergency care systems emergency department |
النوع | Other |
ESSN | 1472-0213 |
الملفات في هذه التسجيلة
الملفات | الحجم | الصيغة | العرض |
---|---|---|---|
لا توجد ملفات لها صلة بهذه التسجيلة. |
هذه التسجيلة تظهر في المجموعات التالية
-
الصحة العامة [431 items ]