Show simple item record

AuthorAljehani, Raghdah
AuthorGrace, Sherry L.
AuthorAburub, Aseel
AuthorTurk-Adawi, Karam
AuthorGhisi, Gabriela Lima de Melo
Available date2023-06-21T06:54:14Z
Publication Date2023-04-21
Publication NameHealthcare (Switzerland)
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081196
CitationAljehani, R., Grace, S. L., Aburub, A., Turk-Adawi, K., & Ghisi, G. L. D. M. (2023, April). Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Arabic Version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-A) with Strategies to Mitigate Barriers. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 8, p. 1196). MDPI.
ISSN2227-9032
URIhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85153600523&origin=inward
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/44638
AbstractCardiac rehabilitation (CR) utilization is low, particularly in Arabic-speaking countries. This study aimed to translate and psychometrically validate the CR Barriers Scale in Arabic (CRBS-A), as well as strategies to mitigate them. The CRBS was translated by two bilingual health professionals independently, followed by back-translation. Next, 19 healthcare providers, followed by 19 patients rated the face and content validity (CV) of the pre-final versions, providing input to improve cross-cultural applicability. Then, 207 patients from Saudi Arabia and Jordan completed the CRBS-A, and factor structure, internal consistency, construct, and criterion validity were assessed. Helpfulness of mitigation strategies was also assessed. For experts, item and scale CV indices were 0.8–1.0 and 0.9, respectively. For patients, item clarity and mitigation helpfulness scores were 4.5 ± 0.1 and 4.3 ± 0.1/5, respectively. Minor edits were made. For the test of structural validity, four factors were extracted: time conflicts/lack of perceived need and excuses; preference to self-manage; logistical problems; and health system issues and comorbidities. Total CRBS-A α was 0.90. Construct validity was supported by a trend for an association of total CRBS with financial insecurity regarding healthcare. Total CRBS-A scores were significantly lower in patients who were referred to CR (2.8 ± 0.6) vs. those who were not (3.6 ± 0.8), confirming criterion validity (p = 0.04). Mitigation strategies were considered very helpful (mean = 4.2 ± 0.8/5). The CRBS-A is reliable and valid. It can support identification of top barriers to CR participation at multiple levels, and then strategies for mitigating them can be implemented.
Languageen
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Subjectaccess to health care
cardiac rehabilitation
psychometrics
questionnaires and surveys
referral
validity (epidemiology)
TitleTranslation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Arabic Version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-A) with Strategies to Mitigate Barriers
TypeArticle
Issue Number8
Volume Number11


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record