Show simple item record

AuthorElmahjub, Ezieddin
Available date2024-01-21T05:18:19Z
Publication Date2021-02-01
Publication NameOxford Journal of Law and Religion
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa023
CitationEzieddin Elmahjub, Islamic Jurisprudence as an Ethical Discourse: An Enquiry into the Nature of Moral Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, Volume 10, Issue 1, February 2021, Pages 16–42, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa023
ISSN20470770
URIhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121116780&origin=inward
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/50924
AbstractThis article seeks to develop a better understanding of the normative nature of moral reasoning in Islamic legal theory (usul al-fiqh). This theory is built on a foundational proposition suggesting that moral evaluation must conform to the divine will, which aims to achieve an ethical state of affairs expressed as mas:lah: A (social good). Jurists use notions of mas:lah: A to interpret revelatory norms and make new rules to guide moral choices in applied ethics. However, very little is known about mas:lah: A s underlying nature of ethical value and normative content. In modern Islamic studies, mas:lah: A is commonly understood in consequentialist/utilitarian terms. In situations of moral uncertainty, Muslims should aim to promote choices that maximize the good. In this article, I offer three insights into the nature of moral reasoning in Islamic legal theory. First, I show that the common consequentialist/utilitarian thesis of Islamic moral reasoning is unsustainable. Second, both classic and modern Islamic jurisprudence introduced two conflicting visions of Islamic moral reasoning. One is rooted in rudimentary consequentialist approach while the other seems to contemplate deontological normativity in the Islamic system of ethics. Finally, I argue that the way forward is to reconcile these conflicting views in one hybrid normative framework to guide our understanding of the content of ethical value and normativity in Islamic legal theory. In this framework, I understand mas:lah: A as comprising first-order deontological principles to provide categorical protection for basic human needs while leaving room for consequentialist calculations of the right action.
Languageen
PublisherOxford University Press
SubjectIslamic Legal Theory
Islamic Jurisprudence
Ethical Discourse
Nature of Moral Reasoning
TitleIslamic Jurisprudence as an Ethical Discourse: An Enquiry into the Nature of Moral Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory
TypeArticle
Pagination16-42
Issue Number1
Volume Number10
ESSN2047-0789
dc.accessType Open Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record