Why do journals continue to publish single-authored systematic reviews? Comment on Pacheco et al, 2023

Abstract

To the Editor, Systematic reviews (SRs) are pivotal in synthesizing existing research to provide comprehensive insights into specific research questions [1]. Unlike traditional literature reviews, SRs employ rigorous, transparent, and reproducible methods to identify, select, and critically appraise relevant research, thereby minimizing bias and ensuring that conclusions are based on the best available evidence [2]. SRs are foundational in various fields, especially in medicine, where they inform evidence-based practice, guide clinical decision-making, and shape policies [2].