Consensus Report of the 20th European Workshop on Periodontology: Contemporary and Emerging Technologies in Periodontal Diagnosis
Date
2025-05-04Author
Herrera, DavidTonetti, Maurizio S.
Chapple, Iain
Kebschull, Moritz
Papapanou, Panos N.
Sculean, Anton
Abusleme, Loreto
Aimetti, Mario
Belibasakis, Georgios
Blanco, Juan
Bostanci, Nagihan
Bouchard, Philippe
Buduneli, Nurcan
Calciolari, Elena
Carra, Maria Clotilde
Chackartchi, Tali
Dannewitz, Bettina
Danser, Monique
Deng, Ke
Derks, Jan
Dietrich, Thomas
Discepoli, Nicola
Divaris, Kimon
Dommisch, Henrik
Donos, Nikos
Dutzan, Nicolás
Eickholz, Peter
Eren Kuru, Bahar
Faria Almeida, Ricardo
Farina, Roberto
Feher, Balazs
Figuero, Elena
Giannobile, William
Gosset, Marjolaine
Graziani, Filippo
Gursoy, Ulvi K.
Hagenfeld, Daniel
Jepsen, Karin
Jepsen, Sören
Kumar, Purnima
Laine, Marja L.
Lambert, France
Lang, Niklaus P.
Li, Yuan
Loos, Bruno
Madianos, Phoebus
Matesanz, Paula
Mealey, Brian
Molina, Ana
Montero, Eduardo
Nibali, Luigi
Preshaw, Philip
Rakic, Mia
Ramseier, Christoph
Salvi, Giovanni
Sánchez, Nerea
Sanz-Sánchez, Ignacio
Shapira, Lior
Stavropoulos, Andreas
Tamimi, Faleh
Teughels, Wim
Tomasi, Cristiano
Trombelli, Leonardo
Vassilopoulos, Spyros
Verket, Anders
West, Nicola
Windisch, Peter
Sanz, Mariano
...show more authors ...show less authors
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: This Consensus Workshop dealt with diagnostic methodologies in the context of surveillance, screening, assessment of stage and grade, prognosis, monitoring and prediction of periodontal status. Several elements provided the impetus for the workshop, including the limited quality of available research on diagnostic tests, the rapid development of new technologies, the implementation of the 2018 classification and the declarations of the World Health Organisation on diagnosis and oral health. Aim: To update and evaluate the evidence on diagnostic methods, considering recent advances in knowledge and the implementation of the 2018 classification. Methods: The European Workshop Committee of the European Federation of Periodontology guided the development of a consensus report after commissioning eight systematic reviews within three working groups. The reviews were discussed during the in-person consensus meeting involving 70 participants from 21 different countries. Results: Working Group 1 discussed innovations in traditional diagnostic approaches, justified manual probing as the reference standard and assessed the value of image-based methods. Working Group 2 analysed diagnostic tests based on microbial and host biomarkers and genetic diagnostic tests. Working Group 3 covered emerging technologies to be used within dental and non-dental clinical settings, focusing principally on the impact of questionnaire-based assessments and artificial intelligence systems (AIS) in interpreting different data modalities. Conclusion: Although manual periodontal probing is firmly established as the reference standard, additional approaches based on imaging, biomarkers, host genetics, questionnaires and the development of emerging applied data science methods (e.g., AIS) are increasingly integrated in periodontal diagnostics.
Collections
- Dental Medicine Research [428 items ]