• English
    • العربية
  • العربية
  • Login
  • QU
  • QU Library
  •  Home
  • Communities & Collections
View Item 
  •   Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • University Publications
  • QU Current Journals
  • International Review of Law
  • 2017 - Volume 2017 - Issue 3
  • View Item
  • Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • University Publications
  • QU Current Journals
  • International Review of Law
  • 2017 - Volume 2017 - Issue 3
  • View Item
  •      
  •  
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The fraud exception in letters of credit – the Chinese approach

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    H08-013-003-2017.pdf (421.6Kb)
    Date
    2017-07
    Author
    Ding, Yeming
    Zeller, Bruno
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In 2005, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) introduced new provisions relating to letter of credit (L/C) transactions in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). This paper will examine the effectiveness of the new provisions concerning the L/C fraud exception rules. The issue is whether the Chinese view of the fraud exception, which was introduced by the Uniform Customs and Practice Model Law for Documentary Credits (UCP), is effective and in line with accepted international views. To that end, this paper will explain the provisions and then employ a comparative approach. It will briefly compare Chinese fraud regulation with English and U.S. jurisprudence and measure effectiveness by noting the prevailing English and U.S. views. This analysis is timely because China is gaining momentum in its economic development; hence, the attitude of Chinese courts concerning the issue of trade financing with L/Cs is important. The conclusion is that, in general, Chinese regulations are in line with international jurisprudence, and therefore, the reforms are working overall. However, some gaps or questions give rise to uncertainty. This paper suggests that the gaps need to be resolved either by courts or through further regulation by the Supreme People’s Court.
    DOI/handle
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/irl.2017.13
    http://hdl.handle.net/10576/11041
    Collections
    • 2017 - Volume 2017 - Issue 3 [‎13‎ items ]

    entitlement


    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Home

    Submit your QU affiliated work

    Browse

    All of Digital Hub
      Communities & Collections Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher
    This Collection
      Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Video