• English
    • العربية
  • العربية
  • Login
  • QU
  • QU Library
  •  Home
  • Communities & Collections
  • Copyrights
View Item 
  •   Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Arts & Sciences
  • Sport Sciences (pre 2023)
  • View Item
  • Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Arts & Sciences
  • Sport Sciences (pre 2023)
  • View Item
  •      
  •  
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Heat stress impairs proprioception but not running mechanics

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Publisher version (You have accessOpen AccessIcon)
    Publisher version (Check access options)
    Check access options
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Mtibaa K.
    Zarrouk N.
    Girard O.
    Ryu J.H.
    Hautier C.
    Racinais S.
    ...show more authors ...show less authors
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Objectives To determine the effects of heat stress on ankle proprioception and running gait pattern. Design Counterbalanced repeated measures. Methods 12 trained runners performed a proprioception test (active movement discrimination) before and immediately after a 30 min, self-paced treadmill run in HOT (39 °C) and COOL (22 °C) ambient conditions. Velocity was imposed during the first and last minute (70% of maximal aerobic velocity, 13.3 ± 0.8 km h−1) for determination of running mechanics and spring–mass characteristics. Results Rectal (39.7 ± 0.4 vs. 39.4 ± 0.4 °C), skin (36.3 ± 1.1 vs. 31.8 ± 1.1 °C) and average body (38.3 ± 0.2 vs. 36.4 ± 0.4 °C) temperatures together with heart rate (178 ± 8 vs. 174 ± 6 bpm) and thermal discomfort (6.5 ± 0.5 vs. 4.3 ± 1.3) were all higher at the end of the HOT compared to COOL run (all p < 0.05). Distance covered was lower in HOT than COOL (−5.1 ± 3.6%, p < 0.001). Average error during the proprioception test increased after running in HOT (+11%, p < 0.05) but not in COOL (−2%). There was no significant difference for most segmental and joint angles at heel contact, except for a global increase in pelvis retroversion and decrease in ankle dorsi-flexion angles with time (p < 0.05). Step frequency decreased (−2.5 ± 3.6%) and step length increased (+2.6 ± 3.8%) over time (p < 0.05), independently of condition. Spring–mass characteristics remained unchanged (all p > 0.05). Conclusions Heat stress exacerbates thermal, cardiovascular and perceptual responses, while running velocity was slower during a 30 min self-paced treadmill run. Heat stress also impairs ankle proprioception during an active movement discrimination task, but it has no influence on gait pattern assessed at a constant, sub-maximal velocity.
    DOI/handle
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.07.008
    http://hdl.handle.net/10576/13662
    Collections
    • Sport Sciences (pre 2023) [‎206‎ items ]

    entitlement


    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us
    Contact Us | QU

     

     

    Home

    Submit your QU affiliated work

    Browse

    All of Digital Hub
      Communities & Collections Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher
    This Collection
      Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us
    Contact Us | QU

     

     

    Video