Ramadan intermittent fasting induced poorer training practices during the COVID-19 lockdown: A global cross-sectional study with 5529 athletes from 110 countries
Date
2022Author
Washif, JadB. Pyne, David
Sandbakk, Oyvind
Trabelsi, Khaled
Aziz, Abdul Rashid
Beaven, Christopher
Krug, Isabel
Mujika, Inigo
Ammar, Achraf
Chaouachi, Anis
Moussa-Chamari, Imen
Aloui, Asma
Chtourou, Hamdi
Farooq, Abdulaziz
Haddad, Monoem
Romdhani, Mohamed
Salamh, Paul
Tabben, Montassar
Wong, Del
Zerguini, Yacine
DeLang, Matthew D.
Taylor, Lee
Ben Saad, Helmi
Chamari, Karim
...show more authors ...show less authors
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Ramadan intermittent fasting during the COVID-19 lockdown (RIFL) may present unique demands. We investigated training practices (i.e., training load and training times) of athletes, using pre-defined survey criteria/questions, during the ‘first’ COVID-19 lockdown, comparing RIFL to lockdown-alone (LD) in Muslim athletes. Specifically, a within-subject, survey-based study saw athletes (n = 5,529; from 110 countries/territories) training practices (comparing RIFL to LD) explored by comparative variables of: sex; age; continent; athlete classification (e.g., world-class); sport classification (e.g., endurance); athlete status (e.g., professional); and level of training knowledge and beliefs/attitudes (ranked as: good/moderate/poor). During RIFL (compared to LD), athlete perceptions (ranges presented given variety of comparative variables) of their training load decreased (46–62%), were maintained (31–48%) or increased (2–13%). Decreases (≥ 5%, p < 0.05) affected more athletes aged 30–39 years than those 18–29 years (60 vs 55%); more national than international athletes (59 vs 51%); more team sports than precision sports (59 vs 46%); more North American than European athletes (62 vs 53%); more semi-professional than professional athletes (60 vs 54%); more athletes who rated their beliefs/attitudes ‘good’ compared to ‘poor’ and ‘moderate’ (61 vs 54 and 53%, respectively); and more athletes with ‘moderate’ than ‘poor’ knowledge (58 vs 53%). During RIFL, athletes had different strategies for training times, with 13–29% training twice a day (i.e., afternoon and night), 12–26% at night only, and 18–36% in the afternoon only, with ranges depending on the comparative variables. Training loads and activities were altered negatively during RIFL compared to LD. It would be prudent for decision-makers responsible for RIFL athletes to develop programs to support athletes during such challenges. © 2022 Institute of Sport. All rights reserved.
Collections
- COVID-19 Research [834 items ]
- Physical Education [131 items ]