Show simple item record

AuthorDerek K., Chu
AuthorChu, Alexandro W.L.
AuthorRayner, Daniel G.
AuthorGuyatt, Gordon H.
AuthorYepes-Nuñez, Juan José
AuthorGomez-Escobar, Luis
AuthorPérez-Herrera, Lucia C.
AuthorDíaz Martinez, Juan Pablo
AuthorBrignardello-Petersen, Romina
AuthorSadeghirad, Behnam
AuthorWong, Melanie M.
AuthorCeccacci, Renata
AuthorZhao, Irene X.
AuthorBasmaji, John
AuthorMacDonald, Margaret
AuthorChu, Xiajing
AuthorIslam, Nazmul
AuthorGao, Ya
AuthorIzcovich, Ariel
AuthorAsiniwasis, Rachel N.
AuthorBoguniewicz, Mark
AuthorDe Benedetto, Anna
AuthorCapozza, Korey
AuthorChen, Lina
AuthorEllison, Kathy
AuthorFrazier, Winfred T.
AuthorGreenhawt, Matthew
AuthorHuynh, Joey
AuthorLeBovidge, Jennifer
AuthorLio, Peter A.
AuthorMartin, Stephen A.
AuthorO’Brien, Monica
AuthorOng, Peck Y.
AuthorSilverberg, Jonathan I.
AuthorSpergel, Jonathan M.
AuthorSmith Begolka, Wendy
AuthorWang, Julie
AuthorWheeler, Kathryn E.
AuthorGardner, Donna D.
AuthorSchneider, Lynda
Available date2023-12-26T08:52:19Z
Publication Date2023-12-31
Publication NameJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.030
ISSN00916749
URIhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674923011132
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/50632
AbstractBackgroundAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition with multiple topical treatment options, but uncertain comparative effects. ObjectiveWe sought to systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of AD prescription topical treatments. MethodsFor the 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, ICTRP, and GREAT databases to September 5, 2022, for randomized trials addressing AD topical treatments. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects network meta-analyses addressed AD severity, itch, sleep, AD-related quality of life, flares, and harms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. We classified topical corticosteroids (TCS) using 7 groups—group 1 being most potent. This review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/q5m6s). ResultsThe 219 included trials (43,123 patients) evaluated 68 interventions. With high-certainty evidence, pimecrolimus improved 6 of 7 outcomes—among the best for 2; high-dose tacrolimus (0.1%) improved 5—among the best for 2; low-dose tacrolimus (0.03%) improved 5—among the best for 1. With moderate- to high-certainty evidence, group 5 TCS improved 6—among the best for 3; group 4 TCS and delgocitinib improved 4—among the best for 2; ruxolitinib improved 4—among the best for 1; group 1 TCS improved 3—among the best for 2. These interventions did not increase harm. Crisaborole and difamilast were intermediately effective, but with uncertain harm. Topical antibiotics alone or in combination may be among the least effective. To maintain AD control, group 5 TCS were among the most effective, followed by tacrolimus and pimecrolimus. ConclusionsFor individuals with AD, pimecrolimus, tacrolimus, and moderate-potency TCS are among the most effective in improving and maintaining multiple AD outcomes. Topical antibiotics may be among the least effective.
Languageen
PublisherElsevier
SubjectAtopic dermatitis (eczema)
topical treatments (therapy)
topical corticosteroids (steroids)
topical calcineurin inhibitors (pimecrolimus, tacrolimus)
topical phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitors (crisaborole, difamilast, lotamilast, roflumilast)
topical Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (ruxolitinib, delgocitinib)
patient-important outcomes (eczema severity, intensity, itch, sleep, quality of life, flares or flare-ups or exacerbations)
disease severity
network meta-analysis (comparative effects)
induction of remission and maintenance of remission (reactive or proactive therapy)
TitleTopical treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials
TypeArticle
Pagination1493-1519
Issue Number6
Volume Number152
Open Access user License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.accessType Open Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record