Assessment of biomechanical behavior of immature non-vital incisors with various treatment modalities by means of three-dimensional quasi–static finite element analysis
Author | Hassouneh, Layla |
Author | Matoug-Elwerfelli, Manal |
Author | Al-Omari, Taher |
Author | Setzer, Frank C. |
Author | Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu |
Available date | 2024-03-14T08:48:41Z |
Publication Date | 2023-10-15 |
Publication Name | Scientific Reports |
Identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44609-2 |
Citation | Hassouneh, L., Matoug-Elwerfelli, M., Al-Omari, T., Setzer, F. C., & Nagendrababu, V. (2023). Assessment of biomechanical behavior of immature non-vital incisors with various treatment modalities by means of three-dimensional quasi–static finite element analysis. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 17491. |
Abstract | The objectives of this study were to evaluate the stress distribution and risk of fracture of a non-vital immature maxillary central incisor subjected to various clinical procedures using finite element analysis (FEA). A three-dimensional model of an immature central incisor was developed, from which six main models were designed: untreated immature tooth (C), standard apical plug (AP), resin composite (RC), glass-fibre post (GFP), regeneration procedure (RET), and regeneration with induced root maturation (RRM). Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or Biodentine® were used as an apical or coronal plug. All models simulated masticatory forces in a quasi–static approach with an oblique force of 240 Newton at a 120° to the longitudinal tooth axis. The maximum principal stress, maximum shear stress, risk of fracture, and the strengthening percentage were evaluated. The mean maximum principal stress values were highest in model C [90.3 MPa (SD = 4.4)] and lowest in the GFP models treated with either MTA and Biodentine®; 64.1 (SD = 1.7) and 64.0 (SD = 1.6) MPa, respectively. Regarding the shear stress values, the dentine tooth structure in model C [14.4 MPa (SD = 0.8)] and GFP models [15.4 MPa (SD = 1.1)] reported significantly higher maximum shear stress values compared to other tested models (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were reported between the other models (p > 0.05). No significant differences between MTA and Biodentine® regarding maximum principal stress and maximum shear stress values for each tested model (p > 0.05). A maximum strain value of 4.07E−03 and maximum displacement magnitude of 0.128 mm was recorded in model C. In terms of strengthening percentage, the GFP models were associated with the highest increase (22%). The use of a GFP improved the biomechanical performance and resulted in a lower risk of fracture of a non-vital immature maxillary central incisor in a FEA model. |
Language | en |
Publisher | Springer Nature |
Subject | tricalcium silicate calcium derivative |
Type | Article |
Issue Number | 1 |
Volume Number | 13 |
ESSN | 2045-2322 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Dental Medicine Research [342 items ]