Show simple item record

AuthorUllah, Sami
AuthorQureshi, Ahmad Zaheer
AuthorAlWehaibi, Talal Ali
AuthorRathore, Farooq Azam
AuthorSami, Waqas
AuthorAyaz, Saeed Bin
AuthorAlKeid, Nurah Hamad
AuthorAlibrahim, Maryam Saif
AuthorAlHabter, Ahmed Mushabbab
AuthorAlketheeri, Wafa Bani
AuthorBashir, Mohammad Salman
Available date2024-08-26T08:42:23Z
Publication Date2024-01-01
Publication NameSpinal Cord
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-024-01018-0
CitationUllah, S., Qureshi, A.Z., AlWehaibi, T.A. et al. Functional priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a Saudi Arabian perspective. Spinal Cord (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-024-01018-0
ISSN13624393
URIhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85199644950&origin=inward
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/58044
AbstractContext/objective: People with spinal cord injury (SCI) are the deciding force behind the rehabilitation program to improve their quality of life (QoL) based on their personal preferences. Here we aimed to determine the preferences perceived most vital by Saudi SCI population to improve their QoL, and explore if these preferences are affected by gender, education, and duration, level, or extent of injury. Design: Participants ranked seven priorities of bodily functions as Rank I-VII with “I” being “Most important,” and “VII” being “Least important.” Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation facility. Participants: 120 participants (>18 years of age) of either sex with SCI without polytrauma, acquired brain injury, neurodegenerative disease, and dementia. Outcome measures: Ranking scale of seven priorities of bodily functions as Rank I-VII with “I” being “Most important,” and “VII” being “Least important.” Results: Of 101 individuals (mean age: 35.2 ± 14.8 years) finally included, 70.3% were males, 66.3% had onset of SCI since ≥ 3 years, 48.5% had a complete injury, and 75% had paraplegia. Most (26.7%) participants ranked walking as the first priority followed by hand/arm function (20.8%). Sexual function was the least important priority (39.6%). Hand/arm function was significantly more important for individuals with tetraplegia (p < 0.001). Trunk strength and balance was significantly less important for individuals with complete injury (p = 0.037). Participants with the onset of injury < 3 years and a complete injury reported bladder/bowel function as significantly more important (p = 0.011). Walking was significantly more important for people with incomplete injury and for people with injury duration ≥ 3 years (p = 0.022, p = 0.002 respectively). Conclusion: The top priority in our sample of Saudi people with SCI was walking followed by hand/arm function while the least desired function was regaining sexual function. Walking was a prioritized function for people with injury duration ≥ 3 years and people with a complete injury while hand/arm function was highly prioritized by people with tetraplegia.
Languageen
Publishernature
SubjectQuality of life
Spinal cord diseases
TitleFunctional priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a Saudi Arabian perspective
TypeArticle
ESSN1476-5624
dc.accessType Full Text


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record