Show simple item record

AuthorKhattab, Omar
AuthorHammoud, Mohammad
AuthorElsayed, Tamer
Available date2024-11-05T06:05:20Z
Publication Date2020
Publication NameSIGIR 2020 - Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
ResourceScopus
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3397271.3401076
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/60886
AbstractMany top-k document retrieval strategies have been proposed based on the WAND and MaxScore heuristics and yet, from recent work, it is surprisingly difficult to identify the "fastest" strategy. This becomes even more challenging when considering various retrieval criteria, like different ranking models and values of k. In this paper, we conduct the first extensive comparison between ten effective strategies, many of which were never compared before to our knowledge, examining their efficiency under five representative ranking models. Based on a careful analysis of the comparison, we propose LazyBM, a remarkably simple retrieval strategy that bridges the gap between the best performing WAND-based and MaxScore-based approaches. Empirically, LazyBM considerably outperforms all of the considered strategies across ranking models, values of k, and index configurations under both mean and tail query latency.
SponsorWe thank Yousuf Ahmad, Reem Suwaileh, and Mucahid Kutlu for valuable discussions and insights. This publication was made possible by NPRP grant# NPRP 7-1330-2-483 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.
Languageen
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc
Subjectdynamic pruning
efficiency
query evaluation
web search
TitleFinding the Best of Both Worlds: Faster and More Robust Top-k Document Retrieval
TypeConference Paper
Pagination1031-1040
dc.accessType Full Text


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record