• English
    • العربية
  • العربية
  • Login
  • QU
  • QU Library
  •  Home
  • Communities & Collections
View Item 
  •   Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Engineering
  • Mechanical & Industrial Engineering
  • View Item
  • Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Engineering
  • Mechanical & Industrial Engineering
  • View Item
  •      
  •  
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparison of different mechanical ventilation systems for dairy cow barns: CFD simulations and field measurements

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Publisher version (You have accessOpen AccessIcon)
    Publisher version (Check access options)
    Check access options
    1-s2.0-S0168169921002246-main.pdf (11.04Mb)
    Date
    2021
    Author
    Pakari, Ali
    Ghani, Saud
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Proper ventilation in dairy cow barns in terms of volume flow rate and air velocity is important to avoid heat stress, which leads to reduced milk production and respiratory disease. In this study, three different ventilation systems for dairy cow barns were compared in terms of the airflow inside the barn using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. The 3D steady simulations were validated against velocity point measurements in a dairy cow barn, with the average difference being within 15%. The first system (barn A) had four inlet fans, 36 sidewall inlet fans, and eight exhaust fans. The second system (barn B) had no inlet fans and ten exhaust fans. The third system (barn C) had six inlet fans and eight exhaust fans. In all three barns, circulation fans were located above the cows resting areas. The results showed that the percentage of the barn's total volume flow rate through the resting area in barn C was 50% and 10% higher than barns A and B, respectively. High air velocities between 3 and 5 m/s was obtained in barn C, the same was only obtained in half of barn B near the exhaust end, while barn A showed the lowest performance. It was shown that it is necessary to have fans on the inlet and exhaust ends of the barn (barn C) to obtain relatively sufficient and uniform air velocity along the barn. Furthermore, the results showed that inlet end fans and sidewall inlet fans (barn A) worked against each other, leading to low air velocity and volume flow rate through the animal occupied zones; therefore, their combination is not recommended.
    DOI/handle
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106207
    http://hdl.handle.net/10576/61234
    Collections
    • Mechanical & Industrial Engineering [‎1461‎ items ]

    entitlement


    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Home

    Submit your QU affiliated work

    Browse

    All of Digital Hub
      Communities & Collections Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher
    This Collection
      Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Video