عرض بسيط للتسجيلة

المؤلفSid Ahmed, Mazen
المؤلفAbdel Hadi, Hamad
المؤلفHassan, Abubaker
المؤلفAbu Jarir, Sulieman
المؤلفAl-Maslamani3, Muna
المؤلفEltai, Nahla
المؤلفDousa, Khalid
المؤلفHujer, Andrea
المؤلفSultan, Ali
المؤلفSoderquis, Bo
المؤلفBonomo7, Robert
المؤلفIbrahim1, Emad
المؤلفJass, Jana
المؤلفOmrani, Ali
تاريخ الإتاحة2019-09-18T05:52:27Z
تاريخ النشر2019-09-03
اسم المنشورJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
المعرّفhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkz379
الاقتباسMazen A Sid Ahmed, Hamad Abdel Hadi, Abubaker A I Hassan, Sulieman Abu Jarir, Muna A Al-Maslamani, Nahla Omer Eltai, Khalid M Dousa, Andrea M Hujer, Ali A Sultan, Bo Soderquist, Robert A Bonomo, Emad Bashir Ibrahim, Jana Jass, Ali S Omrani, Evaluation of in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Qatar, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, , dkz379, https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkz379
الرقم المعياري الدولي للكتاب0305-7453
معرّف المصادر الموحدhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/11880
الملخصObjectives: To investigate the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam against clinical isolates of MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Qatar, as well as the mechanisms of resistance. Methods: MDR P. aeruginosa isolated between October 2014 and September 2015 from all public hospitals in Qatar were included. The BD PhoenixTM system was used for identification and initial antimicrobial susceptibility testing, while Liofilchem MIC Test Strips (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) were used for confirmation of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptibility. Ten ceftazidime/avibactam- and/or ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant isolates were randomly selected for WGS. Results: A total of 205 MDR P. aeruginosa isolates were included. Of these, 141 (68.8%) were susceptible to cef- tazidime/avibactam, 129 (62.9%) were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, 121 (59.0%) were susceptible to both and 56 (27.3%) were susceptible to neither. Twenty (9.8%) isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibac- tam but not to ceftolozane/tazobactam and only 8 (3.9%) were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam but not to ceftazidime/avibactam. Less than 50% of XDR isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam or ceftolo- zane/tazobactam. The 10 sequenced isolates belonged to six different STs and all produced AmpC and OXA enzymes; 5 (50%) produced ESBL and 4 (40%) produced VIM enzymes. Conclusions: MDR P. aeruginosa susceptibility rates to ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam were higher than those to all existing antipseudomonal agents, except colistin, but were less than 50% in ex- tremely resistant isolates. Non-susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam was largely due to the production of ESBL and VIM enzymes. Ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam are pos- sible options for some patients with MDR P. aeruginosa in Qatar.
اللغةen
الناشرOxford University Press
الموضوعpseudomonas aeruginosa
ceftazidime
qatar
enzymes
tazobactam
extended-spectrum beta lactamases
ceftolozane
avibactam
whole genome
sequencing
العنوانEvaluation of in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Qatar
النوعArticle
ESSN1460-2091


الملفات في هذه التسجيلة

الملفاتالحجمالصيغةالعرض

لا توجد ملفات لها صلة بهذه التسجيلة.

هذه التسجيلة تظهر في المجموعات التالية

عرض بسيط للتسجيلة