Darunavir-Cobicistat versus Lopinavir-Ritonavir for COVID-19 Pneumonia: Qatar's Experience
Author | Elmekaty, Eman Zeyad I. |
Author | Alibrahim, Rim |
Author | Hassanin, Rania |
Author | Eltaib, Sitelbanat |
Author | Elsayed, Ahmed |
Author | Rustom, Fatima |
Author | Mohamed Ibrahim, Mohamed Izham |
Author | Abu Khattab, Mohammed |
Author | Al Soub, Hussam |
Author | Al Maslamani, Muna |
Author | Al-Khal, Abdullatif |
Available date | 2022-03-24T05:33:59Z |
Publication Date | 2022 |
Publication Name | Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care |
Resource | qscience |
Citation | Elmekaty EZI, Alibrahim R, Hassanin R, Eltaib S, Elsayed A, Rustom F, Ibrahim MIM, Khattab MA, Al Soub H, Al Maslamani M, Al-Khal A. Darunavir-Cobicistat versus Lopinavir-Ritonavir for COVID-19 Pneumonia: Qatar's Experience, Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma & Acute Care 2022:9 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2022.qhc.9 |
ISSN | 1999-7086 |
ISSN | 1999-7094 |
Abstract | Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first discovered in China and resulted in a pandemic crisis. 1,2 Many agents were investigated with inconclusive outcomes. 3 This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of darunavir-cobicistat versus lopinavir-ritonavir in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted on adult patients hospitalized in COVID-19 facilities in Qatar. Patients were included if they had pneumonia and received darunavir-cobicistat or lopinavir-ritonavir for at least three days as part of their COVID-19 treatment. Data were collected from patients' electronic medical records. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of time to clinical improvement and/or virological clearance. Data were analyzed descriptively and inferential statistics were applied at alpha level of 0.05. Results: A total of 400 patients' medical records were analyzed, of whom 100 received darunavir-cobicistat and 300 received lopinavir-ritonavir. The majority of patients were male (92.5%), with a mean (SD) time from symptoms onset to start of therapy of 7.57 days (SD 4.89). Patients who received lopinavir-ritonavir had a significantly faster time to the primary composite endpoint of clinical improvement and/or virological clearance than patients who received darunavir-cobicistat (4 days [IQR 3-7] vs. 6.5 days [IQR 4-12]; HR 1.345 [95%CI: 1.070-1.691], p = 0.011) [Figure 1]. Patients who received lopinavir-ritonavir had a significantly faster time to clinical improvement (5 days [IQR 3-8] vs. 8 days [IQR 4-13]; HR 1.520 (95%CI: 1.2-1.925), p = 0.000), and slower time to virological clearance than those who received darunavir-cobicistat (25 days [IQR 15-33] vs. 21 days [IQR 12.8-30]; HR 0.772 (95%CI: 0.607-0.982), p = 0.035) [Figure 2]. No significant difference in adverse events incidence or severity was observed. Conclusion: In patients with COVID-19, early treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir was associated with faster time to reach the primary composite endpoint of clinical improvement and/or virological clearance than treatment with darunavir-cobicistat. Future trials are warranted to confirm these findings. |
Language | en |
Publisher | Hamad bin Khalifa University Press (HBKU Press) |
Subject | Darunavir-Cobicistat Lopinavir-Ritonavir COVID-19 Antiviral Therapy Coronavirus |
Type | Article |
Issue Number | 1 |
Volume Number | 2022 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
COVID-19 Research [835 items ]
-
Pharmacy Research [1314 items ]