Priority setting for the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases: multi-criteria decision analysis in four eastern Mediterranean countries
المؤلف | Ghandour, Rula |
المؤلف | Shoaibi, Azza |
المؤلف | Khatib, Rana |
المؤلف | Abu Rmeileh, Niveen |
المؤلف | Unal, Belgin |
المؤلف | Sozmen, Kaan |
المؤلف | Kilic, Bulent |
المؤلف | Fouad, Fouad |
المؤلف | Al Ali, Radwan |
المؤلف | Ben Romdhane, Habiba |
المؤلف | Aissi, Wafa |
المؤلف | Ahmad, Balsam |
المؤلف | Capewell, Simon |
المؤلف | Critchley, Julia |
المؤلف | Husseini, Abdullatif |
تاريخ الإتاحة | 2016-04-26T14:13:24Z |
تاريخ النشر | 2015-01 |
اسم المنشور | International Journal of Public Health |
المصدر | Scopus |
الاقتباس | Ghandour, R., Shoaibi, A., Khatib, R., Abu Rmeileh, N., Unal, B., et al. "Priority setting for the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases: multi-criteria decision analysis in four eastern Mediterranean countries" (2014) International Journal of Public Health, 60 (1), pp. 73-81. |
الرقم المعياري الدولي للكتاب | 1661-8556 |
الملخص | Objectives To explore the feasibility of using a simple multi-criteria decision analysis method with policy makers/key stakeholders to prioritize cardiovascular disease (CVD) policies in four Mediterranean countries: Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey. Methods A simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method was piloted. A mixed methods study was used to identify a preliminary list of policy options in each country. These policies were rated by different policymakers/stakeholders against pre-identified criteria to generate a priority score for each policy and then rank the policies. Results Twenty-five different policies were rated in the four countries to create a country-specific list of CVD prevention and control policies. The response rate was 100 % in each country. The top policies were mostly population level interventions and health systems’ level policies. Conclusions Successful collaboration between policy makers/stakeholders and researchers was established in this small pilot study. MCDA appeared to be feasible and effective. Future applications should aim to engage a larger, representative sample of policy makers, especially from outside the health sector. Weighting the selected criteria might also be assessed. |
راعي المشروع | European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement No. 223075 the MedCHAMPS project. |
اللغة | en |
الناشر | Springer Verlag |
الموضوع | Cardiovascular diseases Decision-making process Low middle income countries Multi-criteria decision analysis Priority setting |
النوع | Article |
الصفحات | 73-81 |
رقم العدد | 1 |
رقم المجلد | 60 |
الملفات في هذه التسجيلة
الملفات | الحجم | الصيغة | العرض |
---|---|---|---|
لا توجد ملفات لها صلة بهذه التسجيلة. |
هذه التسجيلة تظهر في المجموعات التالية
-
العلوم الصحية - كلية الآداب والعلوم (قبل 2016) [151 items ]