Priority setting for the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases: multi-criteria decision analysis in four eastern Mediterranean countries
Author | Ghandour, Rula |
Author | Shoaibi, Azza |
Author | Khatib, Rana |
Author | Abu Rmeileh, Niveen |
Author | Unal, Belgin |
Author | Sozmen, Kaan |
Author | Kilic, Bulent |
Author | Fouad, Fouad |
Author | Al Ali, Radwan |
Author | Ben Romdhane, Habiba |
Author | Aissi, Wafa |
Author | Ahmad, Balsam |
Author | Capewell, Simon |
Author | Critchley, Julia |
Author | Husseini, Abdullatif |
Available date | 2016-04-26T14:13:24Z |
Publication Date | 2015-01 |
Publication Name | International Journal of Public Health |
Resource | Scopus |
Citation | Ghandour, R., Shoaibi, A., Khatib, R., Abu Rmeileh, N., Unal, B., et al. "Priority setting for the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases: multi-criteria decision analysis in four eastern Mediterranean countries" (2014) International Journal of Public Health, 60 (1), pp. 73-81. |
ISSN | 1661-8556 |
Abstract | Objectives To explore the feasibility of using a simple multi-criteria decision analysis method with policy makers/key stakeholders to prioritize cardiovascular disease (CVD) policies in four Mediterranean countries: Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey. Methods A simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method was piloted. A mixed methods study was used to identify a preliminary list of policy options in each country. These policies were rated by different policymakers/stakeholders against pre-identified criteria to generate a priority score for each policy and then rank the policies. Results Twenty-five different policies were rated in the four countries to create a country-specific list of CVD prevention and control policies. The response rate was 100 % in each country. The top policies were mostly population level interventions and health systems’ level policies. Conclusions Successful collaboration between policy makers/stakeholders and researchers was established in this small pilot study. MCDA appeared to be feasible and effective. Future applications should aim to engage a larger, representative sample of policy makers, especially from outside the health sector. Weighting the selected criteria might also be assessed. |
Sponsor | European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement No. 223075 the MedCHAMPS project. |
Language | en |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Subject | Cardiovascular diseases Decision-making process Low middle income countries Multi-criteria decision analysis Priority setting |
Type | Article |
Pagination | 73-81 |
Issue Number | 1 |
Volume Number | 60 |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Health Sciences-CAS (pre 2016) [151 items ]