عرض بسيط للتسجيلة

المؤلفMokter, Hossain
المؤلفLeminen, Seppo
المؤلفWesterlund, Mika
تاريخ الإتاحة2023-07-16T07:35:14Z
تاريخ النشر2018-12-29
اسم المنشورJournal of Cleaner Production
المعرّفhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257
الاقتباسHossain, M., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2019). A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of cleaner production, 213, 976-988.
الرقم المعياري الدولي للكتاب0959-6526
معرّف المصادر الموحدhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618339830
معرّف المصادر الموحدhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/45635
الملخصA living lab is a physical or virtual space in which to solve societal challenges, especially for urban areas, by bringing together various stakeholders for collaboration and collective ideation. Although the notion has received increasing attention from scholars, practitioners and policy makers, its essence remains unclear to many. We therefore performed a systematic literature review of a sample of 114 scholarly articles about living labs to understand the central facets discussed in the nascent literature. In particular, we explored the origin of the living lab concept and its key paradigms and characteristics, including stakeholder roles, contexts, challenges, main outcomes, and sustainability. While doing this, we discovered that the number of publications about living labs has increased significantly since 2015, and several journals are very active in publishing articles on the topic. The living lab is considered a multidisciplinary phenomenon and it encompasses various research domains despite typically being discussed under open and user innovation paradigms. What is more, the existing literature views living labs simultaneously as landscapes, real-life environments, and methodologies, and it suggests that they include heterogeneous stakeholders and apply various business models, methods, tools and approaches. Finally, living labs face some challenges, such as temporality, governance, efficiency, user recruitment, sustainability, scalability and unpredictable outcomes. In contrast, the benefits include tangible and intangible innovation and a broader diversity of innovation. Based on our analysis, we provide some implications and suggestions for future research.
راعي المشروعThis work was supported by the European Commission - the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship grant (proposal number: 749423 ).
اللغةen
الناشرElsevier
الموضوعLiving labs
Characteristics
Open innovation
Challenges
Sustainability
Literature review
العنوانA systematic review of living lab literature
النوعArticle
الصفحات976-988
رقم المجلد213
ESSN1879-1786
dc.accessType Open Access


الملفات في هذه التسجيلة

Thumbnail

هذه التسجيلة تظهر في المجموعات التالية

عرض بسيط للتسجيلة