Show simple item record

AuthorCarr, A.
Available date2023-09-03T06:44:17Z
Publication Date2021
Publication NameAnaesthesia
ResourceScopus
ISSN0003-2409
URIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.15471
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/47159
AbstractAs a female consultant anaesthetist, I fully support the remarks from Critchley et-al. in their article regarding females in leadership and the attribution of undesirable comments when women take authority, using agenic traits that would not be attributed to our male colleagues taking a similar stance.My comments, however, are about the proportion of female undergraduate medical students quoted, and subsequently working as consultants. While agreeing there are certainly fewer female consultants than males in the UK, there are a number of additional factors to take into account. In the article, proportions are used rather than absolute numbers. It is cited that while approximately 55% of medical students in the UK in the last decade have been female, at consultant level only 36.6% of doctors are female . In addition, the article states that, in the UK, female anaesthetic specialty trainees have increased from 28% in 2003 to 50.9% in 2019, but at consultant level only 32% of the workforce are female .
Languageen
PublisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjectfemale consultant anaesthetist
female medical workforce
females in leadership
TitleThe female medical workforce
TypeOther
Pagination1142
Issue Number8
Volume Number76


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record