Show simple item record

AuthorChemaitelly, Hiam
AuthorAyoub, Houssein H.
AuthorTang, Patrick
AuthorCoyle, Peter V.
AuthorYassine, Hadi M.
AuthorAl Thani, Asmaa A.
AuthorAl-Khatib, Hebah A.
AuthorHasan, Mohammad R.
AuthorAl-Kanaani, Zaina
AuthorAl-Kuwari, Einas
AuthorJeremijenko, Andrew
AuthorKaleeckal, Anvar Hassan
AuthorLatif, Ali Nizar
AuthorShaik, Riyazuddin Mohammad
AuthorAbdul-Rahim, Hanan F.
AuthorNasrallah, Gheyath K.
AuthorAl-Kuwari, Mohamed Ghaith
AuthorButt, Adeel A.
AuthorAl-Romaihi, Hamad Eid
AuthorAl-Thani, Mohamed H.
AuthorAl-Khal, Abdullatif
AuthorBertollini, Roberto
AuthorAbu-Raddad, Laith J.
Available date2023-11-06T04:58:45Z
Publication Date2023-10-06
Publication NameScience advances
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh0761
CitationHiam Chemaitelly et al. ,History of primary-series and booster vaccination and protection against Omicron reinfection.Sci. Adv.9,eadh0761(2023).DOI:10.1126/sciadv.adh0761
URIhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85173154701&origin=inward
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/49029
AbstractLaboratory evidence suggests a possibility of immune imprinting for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We investigated the differences in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in a cohort of persons who had a primary Omicron infection, but different vaccination histories using matched, national, retrospective, cohort studies. Adjusted hazard ratio for reinfection incidence, factoring adjustment for differences in testing rate, was 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39 to 0.49] comparing history of two-dose vaccination to no vaccination, 1.47 (95% CI: 1.23 to 1.76) comparing history of three-dose vaccination to two-dose vaccination, and 0.57 (95% CI: 0.48 to 0.68) comparing history of three-dose vaccination to no vaccination. Divergence in cumulative incidence curves increased markedly when the incidence was dominated by BA.4/BA.5 and BA.2.75* Omicron subvariants. The history of primary-series vaccination enhanced immune protection against Omicron reinfection, but history of booster vaccination compromised protection against Omicron reinfection. These findings do not undermine the public health utility of booster vaccination.
SponsorThis work was supported by the Biomedical Research Program and the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Biomathematics Research Core, both at Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Ministry of Public Health, Hamad Medical Corporation, and Sidra Medicine; Qatar Genome Programme; and Qatar University Biomedical Research Center, Qatar University collaborative grant QUCG-CAS-23/24-114.
Languageen
PublisherAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science
Subjectvaccination
protection
Omicron
reinfection
TitleHistory of primary-series and booster vaccination and protection against Omicron reinfection
TypeArticle
Issue Number40
Volume Number9
ESSN2375-2548
dc.accessType Open Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record