Efficacy of photodynamic therapy on candida colonization and clinical symptoms in denture stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
المؤلف | Al-Maweri, Sadeq A. |
المؤلف | Alhajj, Mohammed Nasser |
المؤلف | Anweigi, Lamyia |
المؤلف | Ashraf, Sajna |
المؤلف | Halboub, Esam |
المؤلف | Salleh, Nosizana Mohd |
المؤلف | Alanazi, Rawan H. |
المؤلف | Nassani, Mohammad Zakaria |
المؤلف | Noushad, Mohammed |
المؤلف | Al Khabuli, Jumma O. |
المؤلف | Shamala, Anas |
تاريخ الإتاحة | 2024-02-25T09:49:55Z |
تاريخ النشر | 2024-01-16 |
اسم المنشور | BMC Oral Health |
المعرّف | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03789-z |
الاقتباس | Al-Maweri, S. A., Alhajj, M. N., Anweigi, L., Ashraf, S., Halboub, E., Salleh, N. M., ... & Shamala, A. (2024). Efficacy of photodynamic therapy on candida colonization and clinical symptoms in denture stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health, 24(1), 84. |
الملخص | Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been recently proposed as a promising alternative therapy for Denture Stomatitis (DS). The present systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the current available evidence regarding the efficacy of PDT in the management of DS. Materials and methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ProQuest were searched up to June 7, 2023. All relevant clinical trials were included. RevMan software was used for the statistical analyses. Results: Elven randomized clinical trials (460 DS patients) were included. Eight studies assessed the efficacy of PDT vs. topical antifungal therapy, while three studies assessed the adjunctive use of PDT (PDT + antifungal therapy) vs. topical antifungal therapy alone. The results revealed comparable efficacy of PDT and conventional antifungal therapy on candida colonization at 15 days (MD: 0.95, 95% CI: -0.28, 2.19, p = 0.13) and at the end of follow-up (MD: -0.17, 95% CI: -1.33, 0.98, p = 0.77). The pooled two studies revealed relatively better efficacy of adjunctive use of PDT with antifungal therapy on candida colonization compared to antifungal therapy alone at 15 days (MD: -6.67, 95% CI: -15.15, 1.82, p = 0.12), and at the end of follow-up (MD: -7.14, 95% CI: -19.78, 5.50, p = 0.27). Additionally, the results revealed comparable efficacy of PDT and topical antifungal therapy on the clinical outcomes. Conclusions: PDT might be considered a viable option for DS either as an adjunct or as an alternative to the topical antifungal medications. Further studies with adequate sample sizes and standardized PDT parameters are warranted. |
اللغة | en |
الناشر | Springer Nature |
الموضوع | Denture stomatitis Management Photodynamic therapy Systematic review |
النوع | Article |
رقم العدد | 1 |
رقم المجلد | 24 |
ESSN | 1472-6831 |
الملفات في هذه التسجيلة
هذه التسجيلة تظهر في المجموعات التالية
-
أبحاث طب الأسنان [338 items ]