Opportunistic screening for alcohol use problems in adolescents attending emergency departments: an evaluation of screening tools.
Date
2018-03-01Author
Coulton, SimonAlam, M Fasihul
Boniface, Sadie
Deluca, Paolo
Donoghue, Kim
Gilvarry, Eilish
Kaner, Eileen
Lynch, Ellen
Maconochie, Ian
McArdle, Paul
McGovern, Ruth
Newbury-Birch, Dorothy
Patton, Robert
Phillips, Ceri J
Phillips, Thomas
Rose, Hannah
Russell, Ian
Strang, John
Drummond, Colin
...show more authors ...show less authors
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
To estimate and compare the optimal cut-off score of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and AUDIT-C in identifying at-risk alcohol consumption, heavy episodic alcohol use, ICD-10 alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence in adolescents attending ED in England. Opportunistic cross-sectional survey. 10 emergency departments across England. Adolescents (n = 5377) aged between their 10th and 18th birthday who attended emergency departments between December 2012 and May 2013. Scores on the AUDIT and AUDIT-C. At-risk alcohol consumption and monthly episodic alcohol consumption in the past 3 months were derived using the time-line follow back method. Alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence was assessed in accordance with ICD-10 criteria using the MINI-KID. AUDIT-C with a score of 3 was more effective for at-risk alcohol use (AUC 0.81; sensitivity 87%, specificity 97%), heavy episodic use (0.84; 76%, 98%) and alcohol abuse (0.98; 91%, 90%). AUDIT with a score of 7 was more effective in identifying alcohol dependence (0.92; 96%, 94%). The 3-item AUDIT-C is more effective than AUDIT in screening adolescents for at-risk alcohol use, heavy episodic alcohol use and alcohol abuse. AUDIT is more effective than AUDIT-C for the identification of alcohol dependence.
Collections
- Public Health [433 items ]