Complex Signs and Pseudo-composites

Show simple item record

contributor.author Munia, Mohamed Saleem en_US
date.accessioned 2009-11-25T13:35:38Z en_US
date.available 2009-11-25T13:35:38Z en_US
date.issued 2001 en_US
identifier.citation Journal of the Documentation and Humanities Research Center, 2001, No. 13, Pages 7-31. en_US
identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10576/8393 en_US
description.abstract The purpose of the present paper is to try to find an answer to the question: how are complex signs analyzed in English morphology in the context of Axiomatic Functionalist Theory? The paper provides the tools for analyzing items like hatless, penniless, lioness, countess, hooliganism, and Marxism which are traditionally recognized as morphologically complex, each consisting of two morphemes: a free morpheme and a bound morpheme. With an eye to the notions sign and complex sign as envisaged in Axiomatic Functionalist Linguistics three of these items namely, penniless, countess and Marxism turn out to be unanalyzable, i.e. pseudo-composites en_US
language.iso en en_US
publisher Qatar University en_US
subject English Language en_US
title Complex Signs and Pseudo-composites en_US
type Article en_US
identifier.pagination 7-31 en_US
identifier.issue 13 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record