• English
    • العربية
  • العربية 
  • Login
  • QU
  • QU Library
  •  Home
  • Communities & Collections
  • Help
    • Item Submission
    • Publisher policies
    • User guides
    • FAQs
  • About QSpace
    • Vision & Mission
    • QSpace policies
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
View Item 
  •   Qatar University QSpace
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Business and Economics
  • Management & Marketing
  • View Item
  • Qatar University QSpace
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Business and Economics
  • Management & Marketing
  • View Item
  •      
  •  
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The ethics of outsourcing: when companies fail at responsibility

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2018
    Author
    Ndubisi N.O.
    Nygaard A.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that costs reduction is no longer a complete indication of performance and should not be attained at the expense of the firm?s sustainable social responsibility and environmental aspects. The question of whether outsourcing is a ?blessing? or a ?lesson? remains unresolved in the minds of practitioners and researchers alike. The literature is replete with the up- and down-sides of outsourcing, all going in different directions, making it very cumbersome particularly for practitioners to articulate when and what to outsource (if at all) and how to contain or mitigate outsourcing downsides. Design/methodology/approach: Outsourcing as a two-edged sword can be value creating strategy or a firm?s soft spot. This paper focusses on the latter through a review of sourcing in two leading multinational companies: Benetton, in the fast fashion industry, and Nestl?, in the food industry. Findings: Benetton experienced the biggest catastrophe in the garment industry, the Rana Plaza collapse. Nestl? went through the horse meat scandal, perhaps one of the most complex food crime cases in history. Both cases illustrated the strategic vulnerability that arises from the international outsourcing of production. Research limitations/implications: Clearly, production costs are no longer a complete indication of performance as the two cases unveil. Management control systems should be especially vigilant when outsourcing transfers social and environmental responsibility from one contract to another in a global business context. Monitoring costs cannot be outsourced when it comes to sustainable social responsibility and environmental aspects. Practical implications: Firms can leverage relationships with stakeholder groups, activists and NGOs to help them to monitor their international operations. Institution-based trust to protect brands, increased integration and control are necessary mechanisms. Originality/value: Indeed, global outsourcing in any industry should transfer not only industrial operations but also credible and responsible social and environmental benchmarks.

    DOI/handle
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JBS-03-2018-0037
    http://hdl.handle.net/10576/13136
    Collections
    • Management & Marketing [‎150 ‎ items ]

    entitlement


    QSpace is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Home

    Submit your QU affiliated work

    Browse

    All of QSpace
      Communities & Collections Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language
    This Collection
      Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    About QSpace

    Vision & Mission QSpace policies

    Help

    Item Submission Publisher policiesUser guides FAQs

    QSpace is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Video