Ramadan intermittent fasting induced poorer training practices during the COVID-19 lockdown: A global cross-sectional study with 5529 athletes from 110 countries
| Author | Washif, Jad |
| Author | B. Pyne, David |
| Author | Sandbakk, Oyvind |
| Author | Trabelsi, Khaled |
| Author | Aziz, Abdul Rashid |
| Author | Beaven, Christopher |
| Author | Krug, Isabel |
| Author | Mujika, Inigo |
| Author | Ammar, Achraf |
| Author | Chaouachi, Anis |
| Author | Moussa-Chamari, Imen |
| Author | Aloui, Asma |
| Author | Chtourou, Hamdi |
| Author | Farooq, Abdulaziz |
| Author | Haddad, Monoem |
| Author | Romdhani, Mohamed |
| Author | Salamh, Paul |
| Author | Tabben, Montassar |
| Author | Wong, Del |
| Author | Zerguini, Yacine |
| Author | DeLang, Matthew D. |
| Author | Taylor, Lee |
| Author | Ben Saad, Helmi |
| Author | Chamari, Karim |
| Available date | 2023-10-23T10:25:27Z |
| Publication Date | 2022 |
| Publication Name | Biology of Sport |
| Resource | Scopus |
| Abstract | Ramadan intermittent fasting during the COVID-19 lockdown (RIFL) may present unique demands. We investigated training practices (i.e., training load and training times) of athletes, using pre-defined survey criteria/questions, during the ‘first’ COVID-19 lockdown, comparing RIFL to lockdown-alone (LD) in Muslim athletes. Specifically, a within-subject, survey-based study saw athletes (n = 5,529; from 110 countries/territories) training practices (comparing RIFL to LD) explored by comparative variables of: sex; age; continent; athlete classification (e.g., world-class); sport classification (e.g., endurance); athlete status (e.g., professional); and level of training knowledge and beliefs/attitudes (ranked as: good/moderate/poor). During RIFL (compared to LD), athlete perceptions (ranges presented given variety of comparative variables) of their training load decreased (46–62%), were maintained (31–48%) or increased (2–13%). Decreases (≥ 5%, p < 0.05) affected more athletes aged 30–39 years than those 18–29 years (60 vs 55%); more national than international athletes (59 vs 51%); more team sports than precision sports (59 vs 46%); more North American than European athletes (62 vs 53%); more semi-professional than professional athletes (60 vs 54%); more athletes who rated their beliefs/attitudes ‘good’ compared to ‘poor’ and ‘moderate’ (61 vs 54 and 53%, respectively); and more athletes with ‘moderate’ than ‘poor’ knowledge (58 vs 53%). During RIFL, athletes had different strategies for training times, with 13–29% training twice a day (i.e., afternoon and night), 12–26% at night only, and 18–36% in the afternoon only, with ranges depending on the comparative variables. Training loads and activities were altered negatively during RIFL compared to LD. It would be prudent for decision-makers responsible for RIFL athletes to develop programs to support athletes during such challenges. © 2022 Institute of Sport. All rights reserved. |
| Language | en |
| Publisher | Institute of Sport |
| Subject | Crowdsource data Global sports Remote training Training load Training perception Vulnerable athletes |
| Type | Article |
| Pagination | 1103-1115 |
| Issue Number | 4 |
| Volume Number | 39 |
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
COVID-19 Research [853 items ]
-
Physical Education [143 items ]

