• English
    • العربية
  • العربية
  • Login
  • QU
  • QU Library
  •  Home
  • Communities & Collections
  • Help
    • Item Submission
    • Publisher policies
    • User guides
    • FAQs
  • About QSpace
    • Vision & Mission
View Item 
  •   Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Engineering
  • Mechanical & Industrial Engineering
  • View Item
  • Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Engineering
  • Mechanical & Industrial Engineering
  • View Item
  •      
  •  
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle Integrated with Solar Power Tower and Oxy-Combustor

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2021-01-25
    Author
    Sleiti, Ahmad K.
    Al-Ammari, Wahib A.
    Gamil, Ahmed I.
    Al-Khawaja, Mohammed
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Power cycle that integrates solar power tower (SPT) system with direct oxy-combustion (DOC) supercritical CO2 cycle is proposed and investigated. In the SPT/DOC-sCO2 cycle (Cyc 3), the SPT works as preheater for the DOC/sCO2 system. Two more basic cycles for comparison and validation purposes are investigated including stand-alone intercooled sCO2 power cycle driven by DOC system (Cyc 1) and stand-alone basic SPT system (Cyc 2). Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and multi-objective optimization analyses are performed for each cycle over wide range of operating pressures, temperatures and direct normal irradiance. Compared to Cyc 1 and Cyc 2, Cyc 3 has higher thermal efficiency by 6% and 2%, respectively with higher exergy efficiency and is less sensitive to cycle minimum temperature. However, the LCOE of Cyc 3 is higher due to the large capital cost of its individual CSP and DOC systems. From the optimization analyses, it is found that the decision variables of the three cycles tend toward low Pmax, higher Pmin, lower Tmax, and lower Tmin. The multi-objective optimization shows that the thermal efficiency and LCOE are 41.06% at 6.35¢/kWh for Cyc 1,45.56% at 7.86¢/kWh for Cyc 2, and 46.65% at 8.05¢/kWh for Cyc 3.
    URI
    https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85124495732&origin=inward
    DOI/handle
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2021-66983
    http://hdl.handle.net/10576/51782
    Collections
    • Mechanical & Industrial Engineering [‎1465‎ items ]

    entitlement


    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Home

    Submit your QU affiliated work

    Browse

    All of Digital Hub
      Communities & Collections Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher
    This Collection
      Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    About QSpace

    Vision & Mission

    Help

    Item Submission Publisher policiesUser guides FAQs

    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Video