Show simple item record

AuthorSaad, Mohamed Omar
AuthorMohamed, Adham
AuthorMohamed Ibrahim, Mohamed Izham
Available date2024-08-25T05:37:56Z
Publication Date2024
Publication NameAnnals of Pharmacotherapy
ResourceScopus
ISSN10600280
URIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10600280241241820
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/57884
AbstractObjective: To evaluate the accuracy of abbreviated urine collection (≤12 hours) compared with 24-hour urine collection for measuring creatinine clearance (CrCl) in critically ill adult patients. Data Sources: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis Global; screened reference lists of included studies; and contacted the authors when needed. English studies only were considered with no restriction on dates. Study Selection and Data Extraction: After duplicate removal, 2 reviewers screened titles/abstracts, reviewed full-text articles, and extracted data independently. Studies that compared abbreviated versus 24-hour urine collection for measuring CrCl were included. We assessed the risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. We extracted correlation coefficients, mean prediction errors (ME)—as a measure of bias, and root mean squared prediction errors (RMSE)—as a measure of precision. Data Synthesis: Five studies were included, comprising 528 adult critically ill adults from surgical, medical, and trauma intensive care units (ICUs). Three studies had high risk of bias, and 2 had low risk. The studies evaluated different durations of urine collection, including 30-minute, 2-hour, 4-hour, 6-hour, and 12-hour. Mean 24-hour CrCl ranged from 57 mL/min/1.73 m2 to 103 mL/min. Abbreviated urine collection led to CrCl that correlated well with the 24-hour measured CrCl (correlation coefficient ranged from 0.8 to 0.95). Mean prediction error ranged from 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 to 16 mL/min (from 8% to 25% of the 24-hour CrCl). Root mean squared prediction error calculated from 1 study was 30.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Abbreviated urine collection is used to measure CrCl for renal drug dosing in critically ill patients, but its accuracy is not well-established. Conclusions: Abbreviated urine collection may overestimate CrCl compared with 24-hour urine collection. Larger, well-conducted studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy of CrCl measured using different durations of urine collection in critically ill patients.
Languageen
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc.
Subjectcreatinine clearance
critical illness
critically ill
glomerular filtration rate
renal
urine collection
TitleAbbreviated Urine Collection Compared With 24-Hour Urine Collection for Measuring Creatinine Clearance in Adult Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review
TypeArticle Review
dc.accessType Abstract Only


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record