عرض بسيط للتسجيلة

المؤلفAl-Hersh ,Eilan
المؤلفAbushanab ,Dina
المؤلفAbouNahia ,Fouad
المؤلفRainkie ,Daniel
المؤلفAl Hail ,Moza
المؤلفAbdulrouf ,Palli Valapila
المؤلفEl-Kassem ,Wessam
المؤلفAl-Badriyeh ,Daoud
تاريخ الإتاحة2024-09-23T06:45:23Z
تاريخ النشر2024
اسم المنشورJournal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
المصدرScopus
الرقم المعياري الدولي للكتاب20523211
معرّف المصادر الموحدhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2345218
معرّف المصادر الموحدhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/59180
الملخصObjective: Preterm babies are prone to experiencing apnea of prematurity (AOP), mostly characterised by a pause in breathing lasting a minimum of 20 seconds. Recent literature supported higher maintenance doses of caffeine, indicating benefits. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of high maintenance dose (HD) versus low maintenance dose (LD) caffeine for AOP in neonates. Methods: From the hospital perspective of Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Qatar, a cost-effectiveness decision-analytic model was constructed to follow the use of a HD maintenance caffeine of 20 mg/kg/dose versus a LD maintenance caffeine of 10 mg/kg/dose, in a simulated cohort of AOP neonates, over a therapy follow-up duration of six weeks, until neonatal intensive care (NICU) discharge. The clinical inputs were primarily literature-based, while the resource cost and utilisation were locally extracted in HMC. The cost-effectiveness outcome measure was calculated per therapy success, defined as survival with no apnea and successful extubation removal within 72 hours, with or without adverse events. One-way and multivariate sensitivity analyses were performed to confirm the robustness of the results. Results: With 0.23 (95% CI, 0.23-0.23) enhancement in success rate, at United States dollar (US$) 3869 (95% CI, US$ 3823-3915) added infant cost, the HD caffeine was between dominant (34.8%) and cost-effective (63.7%), with an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US $16,895 (95% CI, US$ 15,242-18,549) relative to LD caffeine per additional case of success. The hospitalisation contributed the most to the total infant cost, and the probability of patent ductus arteriosus was the model input that influenced the results most. Conclusion: This is the first literature economic evaluation of caffeine for AOP. Despite increasing the cost of therapy, HD maintenance caffeine seems to be a cost-effective alternative to LD caffeine in Qatar. Our results support the recent global trends of increased use of HD caffeine for AOP in NICU.
راعي المشروعThe authors thank the finance department of Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar, for providing cost data. The authors also acknowledge the Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library, Doha, Qatar.
اللغةen
الناشرTaylor and Francis Ltd.
الموضوعapnea
caffeine
Cost-effectiveness
intensive care unit
premature infant
العنوانA cost-effectiveness analysis for high versus standard (low) dose caffeine for the treatment of apnea in neonatal intensive care unit
النوعArticle
رقم العدد1
رقم المجلد17
dc.accessType Open Access


الملفات في هذه التسجيلة

Thumbnail

هذه التسجيلة تظهر في المجموعات التالية

عرض بسيط للتسجيلة