Show simple item record

AuthorAl-Hersh ,Eilan
AuthorAbushanab ,Dina
AuthorAbouNahia ,Fouad
AuthorRainkie ,Daniel
AuthorAl Hail ,Moza
AuthorAbdulrouf ,Palli Valapila
AuthorEl-Kassem ,Wessam
AuthorAl-Badriyeh ,Daoud
Available date2024-09-23T06:45:23Z
Publication Date2024
Publication NameJournal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
ResourceScopus
ISSN20523211
URIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2345218
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/59180
AbstractObjective: Preterm babies are prone to experiencing apnea of prematurity (AOP), mostly characterised by a pause in breathing lasting a minimum of 20 seconds. Recent literature supported higher maintenance doses of caffeine, indicating benefits. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of high maintenance dose (HD) versus low maintenance dose (LD) caffeine for AOP in neonates. Methods: From the hospital perspective of Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Qatar, a cost-effectiveness decision-analytic model was constructed to follow the use of a HD maintenance caffeine of 20 mg/kg/dose versus a LD maintenance caffeine of 10 mg/kg/dose, in a simulated cohort of AOP neonates, over a therapy follow-up duration of six weeks, until neonatal intensive care (NICU) discharge. The clinical inputs were primarily literature-based, while the resource cost and utilisation were locally extracted in HMC. The cost-effectiveness outcome measure was calculated per therapy success, defined as survival with no apnea and successful extubation removal within 72 hours, with or without adverse events. One-way and multivariate sensitivity analyses were performed to confirm the robustness of the results. Results: With 0.23 (95% CI, 0.23-0.23) enhancement in success rate, at United States dollar (US$) 3869 (95% CI, US$ 3823-3915) added infant cost, the HD caffeine was between dominant (34.8%) and cost-effective (63.7%), with an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US $16,895 (95% CI, US$ 15,242-18,549) relative to LD caffeine per additional case of success. The hospitalisation contributed the most to the total infant cost, and the probability of patent ductus arteriosus was the model input that influenced the results most. Conclusion: This is the first literature economic evaluation of caffeine for AOP. Despite increasing the cost of therapy, HD maintenance caffeine seems to be a cost-effective alternative to LD caffeine in Qatar. Our results support the recent global trends of increased use of HD caffeine for AOP in NICU.
SponsorThe authors thank the finance department of Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar, for providing cost data. The authors also acknowledge the Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library, Doha, Qatar.
Languageen
PublisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
Subjectapnea
caffeine
Cost-effectiveness
intensive care unit
premature infant
TitleA cost-effectiveness analysis for high versus standard (low) dose caffeine for the treatment of apnea in neonatal intensive care unit
TypeArticle
Issue Number1
Volume Number17
dc.accessType Open Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record