• English
    • العربية
  • العربية
  • Login
  • QU
  • QU Library
  •  Home
  • Communities & Collections
View Item 
  •   Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Engineering
  • Civil and Environmental Engineering
  • View Item
  • Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Engineering
  • Civil and Environmental Engineering
  • View Item
  •      
  •  
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Diaphragm shear strength and stiffness of aluminum roof panel assemblies

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Publisher version (You have accessOpen AccessIcon)
    Publisher version (Check access options)
    Check access options
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Avci, Onur
    Luttrell, Larry D.
    Mattingly, John
    Easterling, W. Samuel
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    A diaphragm is an assembly of planar structural elements interconnected to each other to provide in-plane bracing system and transmit in-plane forces. The diaphragm geometry, supporting frame, type of the panel profiles, the way the panels are attached to each other and to the diaphragm frame govern the overall behavior of diaphragm systems. Full scale testing is the best way to understand the overall behavior and determine the strength and stiffness of diaphragm systems. This paper is a result of experimental and analytical studies on aluminum roof panel assemblies. The main purpose is to check the applicability of Metal Construction Association's (MCA) "Primer on Diaphragm Design" for the strength and stiffness equations when applied over a range of panel depths, thicknesses and profiles. Five full scale cantilever tests were conducted at Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia. The tests were conducted in accordance with the AISI "Cantilever Test Method for Cold-Formed Steel Diaphragms". While the diaphragm shear stiffness development is similar for both MCA and Steel Deck Institute's (SDI) "Diaphragm Design Manual", the only difference is the panel edge term (K). The results of this study show remarkably narrow scatter in tested-to-calculated strength ratios. The tested-to-calculated stiffness ratios compare very well, supporting the proposed use of panel edge term (K=2/3) for aluminum diaphragms. The results indicate that the panel thickness limit can be raised safely to 1.27 mm (0.050 in.) for MCA procedures. The test data further indicate that the MCA strength and stiffness formulations work well for panels with depths through 101.6 mm (4 in.). 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    DOI/handle
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.04.019
    http://hdl.handle.net/10576/21157
    Collections
    • Civil and Environmental Engineering [‎869‎ items ]

    entitlement


    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Home

    Submit your QU affiliated work

    Browse

    All of Digital Hub
      Communities & Collections Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher
    This Collection
      Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Video