• English
    • العربية
  • العربية
  • Login
  • QU
  • QU Library
  •  Home
  • Communities & Collections
View Item 
  •   Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Pharmacy
  • Pharmacy Research
  • View Item
  • Qatar University Digital Hub
  • Qatar University Institutional Repository
  • Academic
  • Faculty Contributions
  • College of Pharmacy
  • Pharmacy Research
  • View Item
  •      
  •  
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Pharmacoeconomics of voriconazole

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2015
    Author
    Al-Badriyeh, Daoud
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Voriconazole is a second-generation triazole that is a synthesized derivative of fluconazole. It first appeared in the US market in 2002. Voriconazole is available in oral and intravenous dosage forms, and does have excellent bioavailability. It comes with wide-spectrum antifungal activity, including high effectiveness against a range of fungal organisms, including Candida, Fusarium, Paecilomyces and Scedosporium species, but voriconazole is especially known for its activity against Aspergillus species. Voriconazole is used in practice for three types of management strategies, which are: targeted, empirical and prophylactic. But voriconazole is a high-cost antifungal agent and, hence, its performance should be evaluated against its cost, especially in relation to the costs of other comparable antifungal agents. This chapter aims at summarizing 22 peer-reviewed pharmacoeconomics studies on voriconazole, which were identified in the English literature, up to April 2014. The studies took place in a number of countries, including the USA, Canada, Spain, Switzerland, The Netherlands, Germany, Australia, Belgium and Turkey. All evaluations were retrospective in nature, with the majority suggesting that voriconazole is a cost-effective option against invasive fungal diseases, via the different treatment strategies, as compared to other commonly used antifungal agents, which included conventional amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, caspofungin, posaconazole and fluconazole. Interestingly, half of the identified publications (n=11) were only related to the economic impact of targeted voriconazole against invasive aspergillosis. Economic data to help guide the utilization of voriconazole as prophylaxis or empirical therapy, as well as targeted therapy against invasive candidiasis, remain lacking.
    DOI/handle
    http://hdl.handle.net/10576/54474
    Collections
    • Pharmacy Research [‎1399‎ items ]

    entitlement


    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Home

    Submit your QU affiliated work

    Browse

    All of Digital Hub
      Communities & Collections Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher
    This Collection
      Publication Date Author Title Subject Type Language Publisher

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Qatar University Digital Hub is a digital collection operated and maintained by the Qatar University Library and supported by the ITS department

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | QU

     

     

    Video