From global standards to local realities: Understanding the Granada Statements in pharmacy practice research
| المؤلف | Gülpınar, Gizem |
| المؤلف | Pehlivanlı, Aysel |
| المؤلف | Babar, Zaheer-Ud-Din |
| تاريخ الإتاحة | 2026-01-28T07:55:23Z |
| تاريخ النشر | 2026-01-31 |
| اسم المنشور | Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy |
| المعرّف | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.09.004 |
| الاقتباس | Gülpınar, Gül, Aysel Pehlivanlı, and Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar. “From Global Standards to Local Realities: Understanding the Granada Statements in Pharmacy Practice Research.” Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 22, no. 1 (2026): 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.09.004 |
| الرقم المعياري الدولي للكتاب | 15517411 |
| الملخص | IntroductionThe Granada Statements were developed to improve the quality and visibility of pharmacy practice research by encouraging consistency in reporting. However, little is known about how these guidelines are interpreted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where professional roles and services may differ. Examining these perspectives can highlight both barriers and opportunities for wider uptake. AimThis study explored how clinical and social pharmacy researchers perceive the Granada Statements, focusing on the challenges, enablers, and strategies that could enhance their application in resource-limited contexts. MethodA qualitative design was adopted, using focus group discussions with researchers in Türkiye. Data were thematically analyzed through collaborative coding and interpretation. Special attention was given to the Statements’ key areas, including terminology, journal selection, perceptions of relevance, and proposed improvements. ResultsParticipants regarded the Statements as a useful framework for clarifying expectations, promoting consistency, and stimulating dialogue about research quality. Barriers included difficulties applying standardized terminology in evolving service contexts, challenges in translating technical terms, undervaluation of LMIC research, financial constraints in open access publishing, and discouraging peer review experiences. Suggested enablers included templates, illustrative examples, modular adoption, culturally sensitive glossaries, and training with editors. A global classification framework for benchmarking pharmacy practice was also proposed. ConclusionThis study shows that the Granada Statements have the potential to act not only as reporting guidance but also as a framework for more intentional, theory-driven, and globally relevant pharmacy practice research. Flexibility, contextual sensitivity, and institutional support are key to achieving this vision. |
| اللغة | en |
| الناشر | Elsevier |
| الموضوع | Pharmacy research Pharmacy practice Qualitative research Publishing standards Developing countries Social pharmacy Clinical pharmacy |
| النوع | Article |
| الصفحات | 162-170 |
| رقم العدد | 1 |
| رقم المجلد | 22 |
| ESSN | 1934-8150 |
تحقق من خيارات الوصول
الملفات في هذه التسجيلة
هذه التسجيلة تظهر في المجموعات التالية
-
أبحاث الصيدلة [1492 items ]




