Show simple item record

AuthorLi J.
AuthorHou W.-B.
AuthorCao M.-K.
AuthorZhou W.-X.
AuthorWang Y.
AuthorFang Y.
AuthorZhou C.
AuthorYin Y.-X.
AuthorToft E.S.
AuthorZhang H.-J.
Available date2020-04-23T14:21:34Z
Publication Date2019
Publication NameJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
AbstractBackground and Objectives: The success rate of leadless cardiac pacemaker (LP) retrieval remains a major concern for this disruptive technology. The present paper performed a systematic review of the safety and feasibility of the retrieval of LPs. Methods: Primary publications that performed LP retrieval were collected and included five animal experiments and two worldwide retrieval experiences in human. The procedural details, such as indication, days post implantation, extraction success rate, and complications, were described. The present paper analyzed factors affecting the retrieval and management of the nonfunctional devices. Results: Retrieval animal models was possible at least up to 2.5 years post implantation, and data from humans suggest that removal of a device that was implanted longer (eg, 4 years and 9 months for Nanostim; 4 years for Micra) could be performed within a reasonable safety profile. The fixed mechanism, implant site, and encapsulation of the LP systems may affect the retrieval process. Conclusions: A high success rate in the relatively chronic retrieval of LPs was demonstrated, which promotes the extensive use of these devices in the treatment arrhythmia in the future. - 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
SponsorThis study was supported by Taishan Industrial Experts Programme (No. tscy20170334).
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Inc.
Subjectdevice life-cycle management
Subjectleadless cardiac pacemaker
Subjectsafety and efficacy
TitleSafety and efficacy of leadless pacemaker retrieval
TypeArticle Review
Issue Number9
Volume Number30

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record