Show simple item record

AuthorNagi, Karim
Available date2023-05-11T11:03:12Z
Publication Date2023-01-01
Publication NameExpert Opinion on Drug Discovery
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2023.2204225
CitationNagi, K. (2023). How can we improve the measurement of receptor signaling bias?. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 1-4.‏
ISSN17460441
URIhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85153376705&origin=inward
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/42646
AbstractG protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are flexible and dynamic signaling entities that can adopt multiple active conformations upon activation [Citation1,Citation2]. However, each agonist stabilizes a distinct receptor conformation at a definite point of time allowing transmission of a specific conformational information to downstream transducers and effectors. This signaling modality known as biased agonism or functional selectivity has rapidly attracted interest as a means to improve drug discovery by screening for drug candidates that can direct their stimuli toward pathways that are therapeutically beneficial while avoiding those associated with adverse effects. Although appealing as a work plan, screening for biased ligands is a challenging process that needs to be correctly assessed and interpreted. In fact, numerous studies reported identifying compounds with biased signaling properties, but very few of those compounds have progressed to clinical testing, leaving open the question of whether it would be possible to translate a biased drug stimulus into a therapeutically desired response.
Languageen
PublisherTaylor & Francis Group
SubjectBiased agonism
Biased ligand
Drug discovery
Functional selectivity
GPCR
Receptor signaling
Screening
Signaling bias
Signaling pathways
TitleHow can we improve the measurement of receptor signaling bias?
TypeArticle
dc.accessType Open Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record