Bias assessment: mQ or RoB?
Author | Doi, Suhail A.R. |
Available date | 2023-09-13T05:52:39Z |
Publication Date | 2023-06-07 |
Publication Name | JBI Evidence Synthesis |
Identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00216 |
Citation | Doi, Suhail A.R.. Bias assessment: mQ or RoB?. JBI Evidence Synthesis 21(6):p 1344-1345, June 2023. | DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00216 |
ISSN | 26898381 |
Abstract | In a recent paper in the journal, Stone et al. propose that JBI adopt the term risk of bias (RoB) wherever critical appraisal, study validity, method- ological quality (mQ), or methodological limitations are used. The authors see this as an important step towards reducing "confusion for reviewers by using similar terms to collaborators and to unify the no- menclature in this field."475) The authors proceed to justify this decision, and while it may be a good idea to drop the terms critical appraisal, study va lidity, and methodological limitations, the authors seem too exigent in their recommendation to consider mQ and RoB as one and the same. |
Language | en |
Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
Subject | mQ RoB |
Type | Article |
Pagination | 1344-1345 |
Issue Number | 6 |
Volume Number | 21 |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Medicine Research [1514 items ]