Assessing Preferences and Feasibility of Multi-Seat Child Restraint Systems (CRS) for Multi-Child Households in Qatar

Abstract

Child Restraint Systems (CRSs) are essential for child passenger safety, yet global adoption rates remain critically low, with usage often falling below 20% in many regions due to socioeconomic and cultural barriers. Larger families in these regions face additional challenges, as traditional CRS designs are space-intensive and financially burdensome, making compliance with safety guidelines difficult. This study examines the feasibility and interest in a multi-seat CRS concept among multi-child households in Qatar, using a mixed-methods approach that included a cross-sectional online survey (n=111) and structured interviews (n=95). Participants were assessed on factors influencing their CRS preferences, including family size, children’s ages, and cost considerations. The results revealed that 46% of survey respondents preferred multi-seat CRSs, with a significant difference observed between preferences and family size (p<0.005). Key features prioritized by participants included comfort, safety, and design quality. Interview results, however, showed no significant predictors, highlighting potential methodological and cultural limitations. This study underscores the potential demand for multi-seat CRS options, particularly among families with two children, as a practical solution to overcome space and cost barriers. The findings provide valuable insights for manufacturers and policymakers seeking to develop culturally sensitive and economically feasible CRS designs that align with the needs of high-birth-rate regions, promoting child occupant safety without compromising family practicality.