Show simple item record

AuthorZaki, Hany A.
AuthorShaban, Eman E.
AuthorShaban, Amira
AuthorShaban, Ahmed
AuthorHodhod, Haitham
AuthorPonappan, Benny
AuthorAbosamak, Mohamed F.
Available date2025-09-01T10:08:02Z
Publication Date2025-07-09
Publication NameAnaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine
Identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101589
CitationAbosamak, M. F., Zaki, H. A., Shaban, E. E., Shaban, A., Shaban, A., Hodhod, H., & Ponappan, B. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Airway Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 101589.
URIhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556825001213
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10576/66951
AbstractBackgroundAirway management is the cornerstone of anesthesia care. Complications of difficult airways are usually fatal to patients. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in enhancing clinicians' performance in various settings. We therefore aimed to summarize the current evidence on the use of AI models in the prediction of a difficult airway. MethodsWe searched two databases, PubMed and Science Direct, for all relevant articles published until March 2025. Statistical software R version 4.4.2 was then utilized to meta-analyze the area under receiver operating curves (AUROC) to identify the best-performing models. ResultsAfter the eligibility assessment, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria and were thus included in the review. Only two studies developed models for patients in the ED, and the remaining 11 studies developed models for patients undergoing different surgeries under general anesthesia. The deep learning model with the best discriminative ability for difficult airways was VGG (AUC 0.84; 95% CI [0.83, 0.84] I2 = 0%). For the traditional machine learning models, those with good discriminative ability for difficult airways included SVM (AUC 0.80; 95% CI [0.65, 0.96] I2 = 99.7%) and NB (AUC 0.81; 95% CI [0.51, 1.10] I2 = 99.3%). ConclusionsOur study found that while some AI models have good discriminative ability (AUC ≥ 0.80) for difficult airways, most of them have just average discriminative ability AUC < 0.80. This, therefore, indicates a need to develop models with better discriminative ability and to validate the developed models.
Languageen
PublisherElsevier
SubjectArtificial intelligence
Airway management
Anesthesia care
Machine learning
TitleArtificial intelligence in airway management: A systematic review and meta-analysis
TypeArticle
Issue Number6
Volume Number44
ESSN2352-5568
dc.accessType Full Text


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record