Absence of the Dissenting Arbitrator’s Signature and its Effect on the Validity of the Arbitration Award
البيانات الوصفيةعرض كامل للتسجيلة
Refusal to sign the arbitration award is considered as one of the procedural controversies engendered by dissenting minority arbitrators. This happens when the arbitral tribunal is made up of more than one arbitrator. The dissenting arbitrator aims, thereby, at questioning the validity of the decision and therefore facilitating the annulment of the decision by the losing party. However, the absence of signature may be due to another legitimate reason: involuntary; namely in case of the arbitrator being taken ill, or voluntary; namely in case of the arbitrator’s absence from the deliberations or proceedings. National laws on arbitration as well as the arbitration rules set by arbitration centers or institutions, in varying degrees, require the signature of all the tribunal members. The Qatari Legislator- under the old regime only required the majority’s signature. Nevertheless, an adjustment of this position has been made in the new Qatari Arbitration Law, Act 2 of 2017. According to this Law, the signature of the majority of the tribunal is deemed to be sufficient, but no reason for the absence of the minority’s signature is required according to Article 31/1. This is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law. Consequently, we may ask this question: is the award binding? Who has to provide the reasons for the absence of the minority signature? What is the consequence for the absence of reasons? Through exploring the motive behind not signing the arbitration award by the arbitration minority, this paper aims at answering the above-mentioned questions in the light of the views evoked in the jurisprudence and comparative law literature.
- 2017 - Volume 2017 - Issue 2 [11 items ]
وثائق ذات صلة
عرض الوثائق المتصلة بواسطة: العنوان، المؤلف، المنشئ والموضوع.
Understanding the jurisprudence of the Arab Gulf States national courts on the implementation of the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Seyadi, Reyadh Mohamed ( Hamad bin Khalifa University Press (HBKU Press) , 2017 , Article)The 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (NY Convention) is a treaty connected with arbitration, the system of dispute resolution used in international trade. In today’s ...
EL SHAZLY, Yassin ( International Journal of Arab Arbitration (IJJA) , 2017 , Article)The issuance of the arbitral awards is not the end of the arbitration process. The enforcement of the award is a very important stage. In this context, the ultimate goal is to find the defendant assets so that the enforcement ...
Brown, Rafael Dean ( Kuwait International Law School , 2020 , Article)There is a growing consensus that emergency arbitration is now a permanent and integral part of international arbitration. Commentators and practitioners recognise the significance of the emergency arbitrator mechanism in ...